Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
07-18-2007, 11:10 PM | #1 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Spark Retard with a Turbo
I sat down and figured out some calculations to see why people lower their compression ratio in turbo cars. Intercooling is a beautiful thing. I got to thinking... in a street engine (which is closer to 10:1 often), can you get all of the benefits of decreased compression ratio with spark retard? I guess my question is... Would knock ever occur in the complete absence of spark (like with preignition from carbon hotspots), or do always need some kind of spark to screw things up? My thought is... with no combustion whatsoever at TDC, you can use only part of the down stroke and basically have an anti-Atkinson cycle where you could take advantage of a long intake stroke with a short expansion stroke. The only major problem I could see is that the combustion will have to take place while the piston is moving quickly, which is very bad for efficiency. Perfect efficiency would only occur with a constant-volume burn.
__________________
|
|
07-19-2007, 12:38 AM | #2 | |
AF -Advisor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Spark Retard with a Turbo
there are many many different flavors of detonation. Its not a one-size-fits-all deal. Too much compression with too much boost with too little octane will cause detonation no matter what you do to the ignition timing. For that matter, too much boost with too little octane rating will cause detonation no matter what you do
The exact parameters you can get away with are way too complex to answer generically. As a general rule, the higher the octane, the lower the CR, the lower the timing, the more boost you can run safely....within reason. What combination you find of those variables, and how you figure out whether you've gone too far in one of them, or a combination of them.....well, that is the magic of tuning engines.
__________________
life begins at 10psi of boost Three turbo'd motorcycles and counting. |
|
07-19-2007, 01:31 AM | #3 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Otago
Posts: 849
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Spark Retard with a Turbo
Bob was talking about the different flavours of knock. I like to think of two distinct ones, the preignition (ignition before the spark) and the detonation (spontaneous ignition started by the spark).
One problem with spark retard is the still burning fuel which is dumped out the exhaust ports. In the extreme case burning up valves, turbos and other exhaust items. It's possible that many people who think a lean condition melted their engine, could have had the knock sensor retard their timing to the point where normal combustion was the problem and the fuel mix may have been fine. Also interesting is the possibility of harnessing detonation to gain efficiency. There's an interesting thread on Engtips right now regarding Smokey Yunick and his high mileage experiments with it. |
|
07-19-2007, 05:26 AM | #4 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Babylon
Posts: 946
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Spark Retard with a Turbo
One benefit or reason for more power from low compression that is rarely mentioned is that if pressures (or detonation threshold) remains constant , the low compression engine is physically a bigger engine.
|
|
07-19-2007, 03:54 PM | #5 | ||
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Spark Retard with a Turbo
Quote:
__________________
|
||
07-20-2007, 01:43 AM | #6 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Otago
Posts: 849
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Spark Retard with a Turbo
Quote:
Are you referring to forced induction with the "physically bigger engine"? |
||
07-20-2007, 05:53 AM | #7 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,191
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Spark Retard with a Turbo
he's saying that with two engines, the same size, same pressure at TDC, one with lower compression, the lower compression ratio engine is almost like a larger engine because of the increased boost, and therefore increased air/fuel in the cylender.
__________________
Mr. T doesn't pity anyone who likes the Black Eyed Peas. He just kills them. Mr. T speaks only when necessary. His main form of communication is folding his arms and slowly shaking his head. And regardless of the situation, he is always understood. On the A-team, Face , Haniabal, and Murdoch were all masters of disguise. Mr T didn't have to wear a disguise. The bad guys didn't recognize him out of fear. |
|
07-20-2007, 05:23 PM | #8 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Babylon
Posts: 946
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Spark Retard with a Turbo
Yes, that's it. Lower the compression and increase boost.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Thread Tools | |
|
|