Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
01-09-2008, 04:28 PM | #1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: roy, Utah
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
I think muscles are only faster when comparing it to a low horsepower tuners, but when you race tuner with the same HP muscle, muscle will be f@*k up, muscles have limited speed, muscles are good when talking about engine, but the overall performance, tuners will f@*k em dwn, got it mofus
|
|
01-09-2008, 06:21 PM | #2 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Invalid
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
well I can tell from your post and your need for speed name that you know absolutely nothing, and like to make giant sweeping statements with no facts.
Congrats |
|
01-09-2008, 08:52 PM | #3 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Steamboat, Colorado
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
Generally speaking, muscle cars are good for acceleration and tuners are good for top speed. One is not better than the other, each have their strongpoints and weakpoints.
__________________
1998 Chevrolet Blazer LT (95% stock) Pioneer AVH-P7500 DVD receiver 12" Alpine Type-R in a sealed box PIAA Super Plasmas GT-X bulbs PIAA Xtreme White bulbs K & N drop-in filter "Melo" and "AI". Enough said. |
|
01-09-2008, 11:59 PM | #4 | |
Scuderia Kimi
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
NFS is not reality.
It impossible to compare tuned cars anyways. There is always someone willing to put more money into a car to make it faster then someone else's.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
|
01-10-2008, 10:00 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Thread starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: roy, Utah
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
i'ma tell you folks, a 4WD skyline R34 can beat a very powerful mustang when it gets enough horse to run its whole body, 0-60, tuners f@ck muscles up, even a 900 horse or a 1000 horse...... wat ya dawgs?
|
|
01-10-2008, 10:02 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Thread starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: roy, Utah
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
sickcallawayc12, u might be right when a tuner car is a stock
|
|
01-10-2008, 10:06 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Thread starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: roy, Utah
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
Gforce, maybe you are, im a skyline tuner and every muscle i raced with, i take 'em down, and bullshit, they cried because of there shitty car
|
|
01-10-2008, 01:28 PM | #8 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Invalid
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
Quote:
So if I read this right, you are saying that a Skyline will beat any muscle car (which a mustang technically is not) 0-60. Haha, I call bs |
||
01-10-2008, 01:36 PM | #9 | ||
The Red Baron
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
Quote:
Honestly. |
||
01-10-2008, 03:20 PM | #10 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
This is the worst thing I have seen posted on here in a long time.
__________________
Currently own -2007 Civic EX coupe Have owned -1999 Dodge Dakota -2000 Mustang GT -1991 Cavalier -1997 Taurus GL -1987 Ranger V6 -1985 Aries |
|
01-11-2008, 12:43 AM | #11 | ||
Scuderia Kimi
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
Quote:
The Skyline GT-R was never sold in the United States, there is a new one coming out here, but nobody has it yet. Quit confusing video games for reality. Need For Speed isn't even a good racing game. Do some research, get out there and see some drag races or track events, learn what the car scene is really like, then we can talk. There are plenty of good threads here and in the racing section that might bring you up to date with reality.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
||
01-11-2008, 01:41 AM | #12 | ||
The Red Baron
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
Quote:
I'll keep an eye out for your ass tuner boy. I'll have to test out yo mad tight racing skillz. I'll take it you can beat up on small children too? One word of advice. Take a picture of your Skyline with you and your user name in it. Otherwise nobody will believe you and given enough blanket statements and BS you will be banned. Better yet, you can bring it over to my house and I can vouch for you. |
||
01-11-2008, 04:53 AM | #13 | |
Master Connector
|
Re: Which Are Faster?, Tuner Cars Vs. Muscle Cars
This thread is going somewhere quickly
If you want to argue semantics "muscle cars" are "tuner" cars. Just from a different, less technical era.
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|