Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Honda > JDM Motor & Parts info/chat
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
JDM Motor & Parts info/chat Discussions on Mugen, Spoon etc. Plus, info on motor swaps (b18 's, b16's h22's etc) and other JDM info!
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-16-2005, 01:17 PM   #1
420racin
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: houston, Texas
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Angry which one?

im lookin into either gettin a CRX SI or the 90-93 celica GT. the celica has more torque but i like the size of the crx and the fact that the engine can be raced harder. which should i get?
420racin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 01:17 PM   #2
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: which one?

rofl....
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 01:21 PM   #3
420racin
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: houston, Texas
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: which one?

whats that mean
420racin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 03:39 PM   #4
Schister66
AF -Advisor
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Schister66 Send a message via MSN to Schister66
Re: which one?

the celica may have more torque, but the CRX Si w/ a B16 is going to be a hell of a lot faster than the Celica....plus Celicas are ugly
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR
Schister66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 03:49 PM   #5
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: Re: which one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schister66
the celica may have more torque, but the CRX Si w/ a B16 is going to be a hell of a lot faster than the Celica....plus Celicas are ugly
an all trac would rape the shit outta a SI with a b16

I want an all trac

be raced harder best line ever posted
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2005, 06:18 PM   #6
iVteC_PoWeR
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Grand Prairie, Texas
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to iVteC_PoWeR
Re: Re: Re: which one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace$nyper
an all trac would rape the shit outta a SI with a b16

I want an all trac

be raced harder best line ever posted
True the all trac is WAY better than a SI with a B16 but good luck finding one. And he said a celica GT so im guessing he doesnt mean a all trac so i would get the crx rather than a GT.
iVteC_PoWeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 03:00 PM   #7
stopufool
AF Regular
 
stopufool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: carteret, New Jersey
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: which one?

yeah b16 has so many more options for increasing power,
stopufool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 03:23 PM   #8
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: Re: which one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stopufool
yeah b16 has so many more options for increasing power,
so? the all trac a great robust little motor, great powerplant.
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 03:31 PM   #9
stopufool
AF Regular
 
stopufool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: carteret, New Jersey
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: which one?

i think we are comparing the celica gt and crx b16, not the all trac
stopufool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 03:37 PM   #10
Schister66
AF -Advisor
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Schister66 Send a message via MSN to Schister66
Re: which one?

between those 2....not the all trac....i would have to get the CRX, although personally that car is way to damn tiny for me.
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR
Schister66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 03:38 PM   #11
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: Re: which one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stopufool
i think we are comparing the celica gt and crx b16, not the all trac
still a b16 is a swap for any US crx all trac is a swap too.

figuring buying either of these cars either stock or swapped speaking of both powerplants is fair.
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 03:46 PM   #12
Schister66
AF -Advisor
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Schister66 Send a message via MSN to Schister66
Re: which one?

Then i guess that's a fair comparison. I thought that there were CRX Si's that had B16s....maybe they're just a D-series then.
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR
Schister66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 03:46 PM   #13
stopufool
AF Regular
 
stopufool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: carteret, New Jersey
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: which one?

how much do you figure total cost of the celica and the all trac, vs the crx b16?
stopufool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 04:02 PM   #14
Ace$nyper
Banned
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fortwashington, Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Ace$nyper Send a message via MSN to Ace$nyper Send a message via Yahoo to Ace$nyper
Re: Re: which one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schister66
Then i guess that's a fair comparison. I thought that there were CRX Si's that had B16s....maybe they're just a D-series then.
nope SI had d16a6 in US nice little motor but hardly fast.

prices honestly depending on area not as much intrest in celicas so costs are often lower but if you can score deals honda might be cheaper either way i'd say said and done would be with in few hundard of each other.

The main reason i'd even think of bringing the all trac or a swapped turbo celica into this he was looking at a nonstock car vs a stock one so the comparsion really isn't that well laid out.
Ace$nyper is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Honda > JDM Motor & Parts info/chat


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts