Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
12-22-2001, 09:40 PM | #16 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Anyone see the cars anymore in the dupont registry. About a year ago, there were atleast 3 in every months issue, now I haven't seen any posted in a LONG time.
Last I heard, they are going for $125,000+ (USD) One thing to remember is that you need a special Vector mechanic to work on a car, I heard a story once that some guy blew out both his turbos and punctured the cars frame - which is EXTREMELY tough to do seeing its made out of Kevlar and honeycombed alluminum - and he had to hire a special Vector mechanic @ $300/hour. He also said most of the parts on the car, the non-exotic parts, were off of older American cars, like the taillamp fixture. If anyone has video of the W8, please let me know, hd04@hotmail.com Thanks |
|
12-22-2001, 11:41 PM | #17 | |||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Odd items on a Vector are parts like the display panel and the jet fighter fuses. There is a former Vector W8 engineer that works on W8's in Michigan and I understand that David Kostca, the main engineer on the W8 does do some work on W8's in the old Vector HQ in Wilmington, CA. I am sure Wiegert gets a cut of money. The #9 Vector W8 gets taken care of by his main mechanic. After speaking with him he claimed 90% of the car is easy to work on. They did have David Kostca come and fix something related to the electrial system many years ago. The #12 car had many parts changed so it is not what you call a pure Vector W8. Rumor is the horsepower was jumped up to 1000 bhp thanks to the new parts. I have taken a ride in the car, but we didn't get a chance to push the beast to hard. Quote:
In Japan chassis #13 (believed to be the 3rd or 4th chassis built. Another #13 was built in 1992) was sold for $60,000. Other Vectors have sold for well under $100,000. There is a network of owners of buyers working through the Vector Aeromotive Club to help bring them together. In 2002 the club will have listings for Vectors up for sale. Currently there is 3 for sale, but only 1 at a realistic cost. Also watch Ebay Motors for Vectors. Gerald Wiegert listed his personal PP2 (Pre Production #2) W8 on Ebay a short while ago. He was asking a staggering $275,000 and got no bids on it. As of 2001 I would say $115,000 is the going price for a good W8. All exotic cars have issues. Most people could not afford to keep an exotic car going if it as given to them. My friend likes to say "Exotic cars have exotic problems." He has owned over 300 cars and most were exotics. His W8 has cost him $10,000 in repairs just to drive 600 miles. The W8 is more like a race car then a street car. Like most race cars it requires lots of care. I would not suggest anyone to buy a W8 unless they deep pockets and strong will. The M12 also had its share of issues as well. When American Aeromotive begins production of the new Vector (time line unknown) I hope they will build a car that does not need so much work to keep going. More news and info on vectors can be found at www.vectoraeromotiveclub.com (This site is still in Beta mode, but is still fun to see). |
|||
01-01-2002, 10:35 PM | #18 | ||
Oldie
Thread starter
|
Quote:
That is very true. Kinda makes a Z06 which will whip a 550 seem like an even better bargain, just drive it 2 miles down the road to be fixed. $10000 for 600 miles is a bit much, though. I don't know if he drove it alot or not, but you should drive your cars often, or bad stuff happens (Jamie Kitman drives each of his 12 cars at least once every 6 weeks, or so he says). I guess it's good I have a good sense of finance, and when I do start to make money, I won't hang myself
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
||
01-01-2002, 10:58 PM | #19 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
01-02-2002, 07:28 PM | #20 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Which sucks, because cars were built to be driven. Thats it, I'm not buying an exotic, and just keeping designing them, and drive my Mustang and Ranger!
|
|
01-02-2002, 08:34 PM | #21 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
After my test drive in the Saleen S281-E I think I would buy that instead. The Saleen is still semi-rare and I can get parts for it at most auto parts stores. Maybe if GM made a mid-engine Z06, something like the Corvette Indy concept car, then I would get that instead. |
||
01-03-2002, 12:40 PM | #22 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
01-04-2002, 12:43 PM | #23 | |
Oldie
Thread starter
|
The MT900 would be reliable. The engine, suspension, computer, instruments, and other little things that go wrong, are lifted from vettes. Whats different are: brakes, chassis, body. But (disregarding the brakes), if they go wrong, it is going to be very bad. This is one of my favorite cars, it will do 0-60 in 3.5 seconds with 350hp. You can get it with the 1000hp Lingenfelter 427 TT. All this for about $250000. Not too bad
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
|
01-04-2002, 07:26 PM | #24 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
MT900 brakes are standard Brembo's, which are easy to get parts for, if you get a Porsche gearbox, everything is from a 911, if you get the Quaife you'd be SOL on parts, and if you get a Hewland (the AMECO running at Daytona has one) the parts would be fairly common via race sources. The suspension is corvette upper A-arms and uprights(slightly modified by Mosler), Mosler lower A-arms, and Penske coilovers. The most unique parts are the Teklam composite chassis (subframes are standard chromoly tubing), and the body work. The computer control and instrument cluster will be from Stack, with an option for Motec, and not the Corvette unit.
Just don't crash, and you'd have a nice GM serviceable supercar. The streetcar seen in Car and Driver has been on the road with no major problems since its construction in May of 2000. I'm still waiting for someone to order a twin turbo model, that will be one bad mo fo. |
|
01-09-2002, 06:10 PM | #25 | |
Oldie
Thread starter
|
A Lingenfelter 427 TT would be the ultimate. Change the gearing, and 240mph could be a very distinct possibility. 0-60 would probably be the same, at 3.5 seconds, due to traction.
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
|
01-09-2002, 06:34 PM | #26 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Construction of a Z06 powered MT900S should be starting soon. It will be a true 900kg(or darn close), ~435hp barebones streetcar. That should be a really quick 0-60 car. |
||
09-08-2002, 03:02 AM | #27 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Top speed issue.
I decided to look into the data online for the car one of my uncles helped assemble and test. For security reasons, I will not give my name nor my unlces name. If U don't belive what I'm about to say, no prob. I'm not gonna take the time to argue with anyone about it. I'll get to the point. As I said, my uncle was involved in the the design, construction and testing of the W8. Due to my everkasting interest in anything faster than it needs to be, i often asked him about the project he was working on. We had discussed the W8 project including the pros and cons. As for the legit top speed issue, he managed to get it clocked at 174MPH. on a large area of level ground. He mentioned the instability issue after passing the 150MPH mark. When I asked why, he said the camber of the car, drag coeficient, and downforce were not working well enough together to keep the car firmly on the track. when I had asked about teh speeb beign less than the stated 218MPH he said that the engine did not have a large and direct enough intake for the engine to run at full ability. Later on, he manged to get authorization to toy with teh body design for his own experiments. He adjusted the ground effects and created 2 nearly direct intakes for the engine. While the timing was not official, he performed a 0-60 in 3.6 sec. The 1/4 mile was in 10.9sec. The top speed was 253PMH before he ran out of track. He estimated another 10MPH for the full top end. All he had adjusted was the body. If I recall corrctly, he said he dropped about 150LBS from the total weight of the car. Well, feel free to reply as I'm sure U will. 8-)
|
|
09-08-2002, 09:13 PM | #28 | |
Oldie
Thread starter
|
Well, if what you say is true, it is impressive, to say the least. But I do have a hard time believing that a car (albeit, with a 650+ hp engine) that only has a 3 speed auto, could go this fast.
Although I believe it is worth mentioning that a car built on such limited resources could never have been properly 'sorted'. So this adds credibility to your story.
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
|
09-09-2002, 04:06 PM | #29 | |
Old Mod
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: None
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
One problem to the theoretical top speed of 253 mph is that third gear could only provide a top speed in the 230 mph range. The original W2 was claimed to have a top speed of 237 mph redlining in third gear.
Was this "253mph" run clocked with anything besides the speedometer of the vehicle? |
|
09-12-2002, 11:58 PM | #30 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
253 BS Per Hour if you ask me...
Porsche is God, I have spent some time with David Kostca, Gerald Wiegert, and other Vector Aeromotive related people. Kostca was the main man behind the W-8 and did a ton of work on the W-8. He mentioned how the top speed where thoery, not reality. When you consider a car like SAleen S7, McLaren F1, Porsche GT1, or EB110 SS never broke 250 mph, I have a hard time with anyone claiming a Vector went that fast. Group C race cars at Le Mans would have a tough time breaking 250 mph. If a Group C (also known as GTP here) could not break 250 mph, then no Vector could.
You would have had to throw away the GM transmission and do major body modifications to have a chance of breaking 250mph. Dropping 150lbs is not enough to help, I would guess the car would need to lose 500lbs or more. You better check with your Uncle about those speeds. He must of been reading kilometers not mph. I have yet to find any real proof of any W-8 ever breaking 180 mph. |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|