Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
04-07-2004, 11:01 PM | #16 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
the SR20det swap isnt legal any any states as far as i know
__________________
See ya.... |
|
04-08-2004, 12:18 AM | #17 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
but it makes much sense for the muthafucka to go get his engine swap then have to put his KA back in just cuz ur ass lied///// "but Zanark said it was legal!!...."
__________________
BANNED |
||
04-08-2004, 12:35 AM | #18 | ||
AF Newbie
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
|
||
04-08-2004, 12:46 AM | #19 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: RIchmond, Virginia
Posts: 468
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Then I was mistaken and I apologize for false information, its just seeing so many people around in my area have done these swaps and are also insured i asumed it would be legal if it passed emissions. But there was no need for the comments. Thanks.
|
|
04-08-2004, 12:56 AM | #20 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
but yes, there was need for a comment....and no thanks...
__________________
BANNED |
||
04-08-2004, 07:15 AM | #21 | |
Banned
|
the KA24 is far more reliable. When something breaks on it you can go get the parts at most parts stores for it. When something breaks on your RB or SR your car sits there waiting days/weeks for parts from Japan.
|
|
04-08-2004, 09:39 AM | #22 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
^ nope, SR parts are easily found here. The non-turboed version is used in the sentra. the Sentra uses the sr20de just not turboed. the RB you will have to wait for awhile. That was the main reason my friend chose the SR swap instead of the RB swap
__________________
|
|
04-08-2004, 09:59 AM | #23 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
I hate to break it to your friends, but if they get into a large enough accident were financial damages are high the insurance company on their side will rule 'illegal equipment' and not have to provide coverage (I can guarantee you they will comb through the car to figure out anything to not have to pay out a large claim). The insurance one the 'victims' side will rule 'illegal equipment' and use that to imply racing. Chances are a fender bender will never have the 'powertrain' checked, but it's an illegal swap just as everyone speeds too, but only a few get caught. Å |
||
04-08-2004, 04:05 PM | #24 | ||
Banned
|
Re: Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
this is not true, name 5 parts on them that are interchangeable... block is different pistons are different pulleys are different manifolds are different IGNITION is DIFFERENT(thats an important one) Cooling is different Computer/Electrical is different Headgasket is different. you shouldn't even really put it in the same class as a SR20det. Yes they are both SR20's but thats it. What the similarities are and why its still called a SR is the Displacement and bore/stroke on both engines is the same. They are constructed SIMILAR to each other. this does not mean that every nut and bolt is interchangeable, they are not twins. One of the main differences is the Ignition system, and that one engine is for FWD and one is for RWD. This design change makes the construction a bit different on the two engines, ex. manifold is different, the coolant passages/hoses/headgasket/outlets on block are all different. The belt system is different as well, Power Steering, A/C compressor.......this is all the normal type of shit things go wrong on with cars that is important to be able to get the parts exactly when you ask for them. A lot of people are blind to maintenance, they think the only thing that will go wrong with their car is if they overboost it and blow up the engine. The thing is not a brick its a machine. It depends on different systems to all be operating properly to ensure the operation of the engine. So say you need to do simple maintenance things on your SR20det, most of them you cannot get from the Sentra. Wires, Ignition System, Gaskets(thats an important one there), oil filters, radiator hoses, belts, serpentine belt system, power steering, air conditioner, and electrical things. |
||
04-08-2004, 05:27 PM | #25 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
man! good shit sr20det power good shit!!!!!!
i can't add anything to what u said! i agree with u, but i fined it hard to disagree when most of what u said is facts! i have a bltp sr20 and i waited 2 weeks for a turbo gasket!!! the whole time i ran 0 boost!!!! i think sr are more better but it all has to do with how often the car been taken care of!
__________________
"A good driver is measured not by his lap times, but by the amount of time he spend trying to make sense of his car" E.K. |
|
04-08-2004, 05:40 PM | #26 | |
AF Newbie
|
Uh yeah
This could go on for ever
Just get a 3 series, and call it good, autocross your ass off. |
|
04-08-2004, 05:59 PM | #27 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 399
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
What the FUCK does parts availability have to do with the reliability of the engine??? If your engine keeps crapping out, then should that engine be thought of as reliable just because parts are easy to find??? It may be practical, yes (for a USDM engine), but reliable, not necessarily.
In general, Nissans have great reliability and can withstand a good amount of abuse (if cared for properly). SR motors are usually in bad shape since they've probably been beaten the shit out of. In terms of reliability on a fair and even level (new vs. new or rebuilt vs. rebuilt) the engines should be about the same, ESPECIALLY since more people are going KAT and most of the tuning and bugs are being worked out as we speak. |
|
04-09-2004, 11:39 AM | #28 | ||
AF Regular
|
Re: Re: Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
I dunno man, a car made entirely out of bricks wouldn't go very fast or last very long. You would automaticly win any car accident though... Hey they call it a red top because the head is made out of a brick right? k cause thats what my friend told me. =(
__________________
-KenOhki2112 |
||
04-09-2004, 01:22 PM | #29 | ||
AF Fanatic
|
Re: Re: Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
__________________
|
||
04-09-2004, 07:17 PM | #30 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Reliability of KA24DE-T vs. SR20DET?
Quote:
I don't know where you get that SR motors are terribly abused. It would be like the average 30-40k mile pull here. Not all of japan in 240SX's (silvia/180sx) are insane like us. Å |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Thread Tools | |
|
|