![]() |
![]() |
Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Aalesund
Posts: 1,879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Rolls Royce Phantom
Do you like it?
Did BMW mess this up too? I especially like how they stole the umbrella idea from Skôda ![]() Some things are best left alone ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
AF Fanatic
![]() |
Ugh...BMW did indeed mess it up, IMO. It may look better in person, but if I'm gonna pay the amount of money a Rolls costs, it better not look like that.
I'm not too pleased with BMW stylists of late...
__________________
![]() ________________________________________ Mark Brown 1991 Volkswagen Jetta (1.8L I4/5-speed/FWD)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seabook, Maryland
Posts: 260
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Suddenly, the Maybach doesn't seem quite so tacky.
![]()
__________________
Larry Wright 1964 Sunbeam Tiger 2000 Mazda Miata 2005 Acura RSX Type S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 642
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I actually think it's OK, and looks quite modern while being instantly recognisable as a Roller. It's definately not what I was expecting, but it would complement a Maybach 62 quite nicely in the garage! Here's a pic of the interior, which I quite like ...
Last edited by Swoxy; 02-15-2003 at 06:26 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: jjjjjjjj
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
That looks like an a$s with so 20zzzzzzzzzzzzz
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
BMW put the same butt on that as they did the 745.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Here for the pussy, man.
![]() |
like pretty much all Rolls Royce product this day and age- ugly beyond hope
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo ![]() 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Old Mod
![]() Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: None
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
You folks definitely aren't Rolls-Royce people. The new Phantom IS a Rolls-Royce. The rear end borrows nothing from the 7-Series. BMW did not mess up the design of Rolls-Royce, they gave it back. While I've liked the Silver Spur/Wraith and the Silver Spirit generations, REAL Rolls-Royces haven't been produced since the early 1960s. The new Phantom puts Rolls-Royce back on track. These cars were never meant to be driver's cars, they are meant to be chauffer driven.
The styling of the new Phantom, in person as well as in pictures, harks back to the classic Phantom. It's large and imposing. The bustle back connects this modern car with the classic cars when a trunk was literally a trunk lashed to the back. This is not the car for people who enjoy driving. It was not intended to be. It is a Rolls-Royce. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 642
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I agree completely Hudson! The car is obviously doing well. They're raising the production from one a day to three. Rolls said that they've met all their quality targets and they're currently producting dealer and promotion cars (the first customer car was delivered on 1st January 2003). The next set of customer cars will be ready in April. There's going to be a whole new dealer network, with about 70 around the world by April.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Here for the pussy, man.
![]() |
Quote:
Sorry- but the only thing that Rols Royce resembles is Optimus Prime from Transformers ![]() ![]()
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo ![]() 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Old Mod
![]() Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: None
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
CFA
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Im 100% with Hudson. The Phantom is a true Rolls Royce, in the way its engineered and even the way it looks. Its ugly alright, but in a Rolls Royce kind of way, which makes it fine for me. Ill take one of these ahead of the uninspired, cynical Maybach any day of the week.
Whoever said it has the same rear as a 7-series is either drunk, or blind, or both. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Actually, I'm neither blind nor drunk. I just meant that it is a very similar rear, in the trunk lid design.
Maybe you should lay off the sauce!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
CFA
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Im keeping well away from the sauce, don’t worry about me
Ok the trunk is protruding on both cars but the effect is nowhere near the same, hence a different butt ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Maybe I should have said that BMW attempted for the same effect on the 745. I don't really care, I can't afford either one!!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|