Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
07-05-2006, 10:19 PM | #46 | |
Razor Sharp Twit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: london
Posts: 5,863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
maybe i am that 10%.
i just remember someone pulling in front of me from the inside and the brakes not behaving how i expected them to behave and requiring me to cadance.
__________________
AF's Guidelines Read them. __________________ Currently in the process of re-hosting my photos. If any go missing, drop me a PM. |
|
07-05-2006, 11:35 PM | #47 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
I agree, it's very rare that a faster car is going to make you want to drive slower to more thoroughly explore the limits of a car. Take me for a example. I'm a pretty aggressive driver by nature. Back when I had my Camry, I drove the shit out of it, but I never really pushed it as hard as I could, because...it was just a Camry. I knew exactly what would happen if I tried to take a 90-degree right-hander at 40 mph in that car. Then I got my '04 Lancer Ralliart, and suddenly, I was superman! It was considerably sportier than the Camry, and driving it back to back with my friend's Evo, though it obviously didn't perform nearly as well, it had the same kind of feel. Well, it took me a grand total of four days to smash that car into a wall at 78 mph, totalling it. So, I speak from experience when I say that moving up to a sportier car is going to make you want to drive faster.
However, at the end of day, it definitely does come down to the driver. When I get my Impreza last August, I didn't even push it at all for six months. I took it slow, gradually learning how the car reacts to trail braking, feinting, e-braking, etc., because I had learned the cost of recklessness. So, I would strongly advise starting off with a slower car and learning how to control your car before you step up to something like a 300ZX Twin Turbo.
__________________
My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. |
|
07-06-2006, 04:29 PM | #48 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: san jose, California
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
To be honest, i am truly a safe driver. I never did any crazy things with my car. I may go past the speed limit most of the time but then who doesnt? I know the safety issues when it coems to cornering or driving in the hills so most of the time i drive safely around those areas. I guess you guys are right about putting a novice driver in a fast car. We won't really know what happen until i get in one. I won't be driving recklessly with it though, thats for sure. I just need to learn how to drive it properly.
|
|
07-06-2006, 04:54 PM | #49 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
if I were going to college I don't think I would be wanting a car payment anyway. Get something cheap and as new as possible.
|
|
07-06-2006, 06:33 PM | #50 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
Quote:
__________________
My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. |
||
07-07-2006, 12:07 AM | #51 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: san jose, California
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
Alright guys, I think i'll probably will be searching for N/A 300zx. Anyone here knows much about it? How reliable are these cars? I found one within my budget, but it has liek 130k on it already.
|
|
07-07-2006, 12:45 AM | #52 | ||
Z Cars Fanatic
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
Quote:
easily known to last 200k miles without any huge problems if well taken care of. dont buy an automatic...try to stay away from the 89-90. thats about it...
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4 |
||
07-07-2006, 01:20 AM | #53 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: san jose, California
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
it's goign to be my first time purchasing a used car from the dealers lot. what should i be expecting from the car? what should i look out for? any tips?
oh and also, whats wrong with the 1990 models? |
|
07-07-2006, 03:06 AM | #54 | ||
Z Cars Fanatic
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
Quote:
basically, 90's had what they call "soft valves". i could sit down and explain it to you but all is it is that nissan changed the valves because some of the earlier ones off the production line tended to lose compression after so many miles. basically, if it hasnt happened by 100k miles, it probably isnt gonna happen. if your looking at automatics, im pretty sure the 90' automatics were a little less stout than the later models. thats essentially it... just drive it, make sure it is solid, ask the owner about anything you see or find suspicious...if he starts getting jittery you know he is covering up something. sometimes it may be wise to take it to a experienced Z mechanic (if you live in an area with one) before you buy it and have them look it over. most shops charge like half an hour labor charge to do a pre-purchase inspection. with the N/A...when looking it over...just look over it like you would with any other used car. ask questions...alot of times you can sense sketchiness just buy keeping the conversation going. difference in models and some differences in years: 90's - no air bag 91's - some had air bags? 92's some had air bags? 93's - all had air bags, convertible model offered 2+2 - about 8 inches longer than the 2 seater and has a pair of book shelves behind the driver's seat. 100lbs heavier than 2 seater slicktop - no t-tops and pure base models. 200lbs lighter than 2 seater coupe 2 seater coupe is the standard. weighs in at about 3300lbs. those should be able the only variations in the N/A models. there were a bunch more changes with the TT models. good luck
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4 |
||
07-07-2006, 03:21 AM | #55 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pacific, Washington
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
"Soft valves" explained:
The early models, mostly 1989 models outside of the US but a few early run 1990 US models, had an intake valve that was significanly harder than the later style vavles. Thats all well and good except that at higher rpms the valve would sometimes start to "bounce" off the valve seat as it closed. Meaning it closed hard enough it would bounce off slighly before closing, just as if you hit a piece of cast iron with a hammer, it would strike and bounce off a few times before laying flat. Anyway, that bouncing had a tendency to damage the valve seat which can lead to low compression. Heres a bit more detailed write up: http://twinturbo.net/net/viewmsg.asp...&msg_id=916703 Anyway, it happens with some, doesn't with others, there is hard driven 90 models out there with 200k+ miles on them without the symptoms of "valve bounce". Here is a decent write up for purchasing a Z: http://twinturbo.net/ttnetfaq/FAQpag...urchasing.html Z32s are pretty reliable, they don't really have any particular part or system that likes to break. If an early model make sure the PTU recall work was done. It's located on the passenger side timing belt cover with two wires connecting to it on opposite sides. The original would be made of metal with ridges on it, the correct later type would be made of black plastic. See if you can find out when the last timing belt service was done. Nissan puts timing belt replacement on the NAs out at 105,000 miles but given the service work done at 60,000 it's usually replaced then by owners. There is also a bit more extensive 120,000 mile servicing. You can get all of parts as a kit from places like www.conceptzperformance.com and its all pretty simple work.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were. |
|
08-27-2008, 06:08 PM | #56 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mv, Ohio
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2.5rs vs 300zx
300zx has much much more performance. really no comparison. i'v actually found decent tt 300's for 5 grand.. im actually looking for an n/a just because its a first car then later swap in the tt. i would definitly go with the 300zx unless you have to drive in quite a bit of snow and all. should be an any decision on this one.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Thread Tools | |
|
|