Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
View Poll Results: Which Do you prefer
69 19 57.58%
70 14 42.42%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2004, 09:43 PM   #16
xXxRocker5150
AF Enthusiast
 
xXxRocker5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somewhere in, Illinois
Posts: 3,219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to xXxRocker5150
Re: 69 or 70

Dude... Vicious, I don't mean to sound like a jerk, but we can't make a decision for ya, I mean ur decision has to come from the heart man, otherwise you'll end up regreting it later, I see it in my dad's eyes when he gave his mom's 68 charger to the junkyard, it was a nice blue one... Good luck with the buy and post some pics!
xXxRocker5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 07:52 AM   #17
g2driver
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NotAvail
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The 69, first the grille looks better and it will be worth more because it is the duke's car.
g2driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2005, 08:56 PM   #18
Fleet 472
AF Newbie
 
Fleet 472's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Fernando Valley, California
Posts: 85
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The '68-'70 are all good years. 1969 is my favorite year for Mopars (and Cadillacs and probably all muscle cars) so I choose that year for the Charger.
__________________
'66 Plymouth Fury VIP (383), '69 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham, '70 Sedan de Ville, '76 Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine
Fleet 472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 08:55 PM   #19
KManiac
AF Enthusiast
 
KManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Concord, California
Posts: 579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 69 or 70

I vote for the 1970 Charger. Of the second generation Chargers (1968, 1969 & 1970), I like the 1970 front end best of all. I prefer the 1969/1970 rear end better than the 1968. The dual round taillights of the 1968 do nothing for me.

My brother once owned a 1970 Charger 500. This car had a 383 Magnum with Torqueflite. The dual exhaust had a pair of blown out glass packs in place of the mufflers with no tailpipes beyond the glass packs. This car was loud and a good performer. I nicknamed this car "The Beast" and it stuck in our family. It was dark metallic green with black vinyl top and white bucket seat interior with center console and floor shift. A neat old car.
__________________
"This car may be old, but it will still climb Kirker Pass at 110!"

1962 Chrysler 300 2-door hardtop/1964 Chrysler 300-K convertible/1964 Chrysler Newport 4-door sedan/1964 Chrysler 300-K hardtop with Firepower 390/2x1964 Chrysler 300-K hardtop/1964 Chrysler 300 convertible/1964 Chrysler "Silver 300-K" with factory 4-speed/1964 Chrysler New Yorker Salon/1980 Dodge D-50 Sport/1986 Lincoln Continental/1989 Honda Accord DX/1989 Lincoln Mark VII BB/1991 Dodge Shadow ES convertible
KManiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 01:13 AM   #20
fuzzypuppy
AF Regular
 
fuzzypuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lomita, California
Posts: 240
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 69 or 70

aaahh, my first car, a 1970 cornet w/a 383, it was in 79 I was 16, paid $225.00 for it from a girl had just bought a pinto and wanted to get rid of the "gas hog" (gas shortages), still remember the plate #, 862 bli, no rust at all, ran like a raped ape, in 80 it was stolen, found it 1 month later, "no help from the cops" at a dealership, the guy tried to trade it in on a new van, it was never the same, I sold it a year later for $500.00, and bought a 68 firebird 400. I sure wish I had that car again, I saw it 10 years later in long beach cali, and it was just thrashed, a druggie was sleeping in it.
Nothing replaces that first car,
fuzzypuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 08:57 PM   #21
kerpalavtar
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 69 or 70

The 69 looks hot!!! Its the best compared to those two.. Well, thats my 2 cents
__________________
Im blogging about autopartswarehouse
kerpalavtar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 05:17 PM   #22
MoparMaiden
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 69 or 70

My first project was going to be a 70 Charger about a year & a half ago. Peeled it from a guy in my neighborhood - he'd had it forever, never drove it and I WANTED IT! Got the courage to go to the door & ask - he sold it to me for less than I ever thought possible and I drove it home!

Before I could get the car into my name I was offered 2.5 times what I paid so away she went. Still regret it but completely understand your dilemma. Personally the 68 is my fave but there are so few differences body-wise it's a judgment call. As far as HP, that can always be modified with enough time & money!

I have to ask - where on earth are you located that you have the option? In the Pacific NW these are very hard to come by and of course in the past few years anyone with a Mopar thinks they're sitting on a gold mine regardless of condition. Thank you Barrett-Jackson!

Look at the grill & tail panel - that's gonna make the decision for you!
MoparMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 06:50 PM   #23
maxwedge
A990 racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chestertown, New York
Posts: 16,953
Thanks: 25
Thanked 371 Times in 365 Posts
Re: 69 or 70

Welcome to AF, if you look at the last post date it would seem this thread has run it's course, we'll see.
__________________
maxwedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 10:30 PM   #24
sub006
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Palos Verdes Estates, California
Posts: 621
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 69 or 70

Because of the "Dukes" connection, '69s are scarcer and more expensive than '70s. There's even a body shop "cottage industry" welding '69 rear panels/taillights onto '70s. Unless I was going to paint it orange, I'd look for a better deal on a '70.
sub006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 03:41 PM   #25
FASCAR
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lockhart, Texas
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 69 or 70

Most Definately the 69 ...I suppose because I have one , and My brother in Las vegas has a 68. Mine is nearly the same weight But with my 496 Stroker and 410 rears He still has trouble keeping up with me. (by about 10 car lengths)...Build happy...

Last edited by FASCAR; 01-15-2010 at 03:52 PM. Reason: add picture
FASCAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2010, 01:54 AM   #26
sub006
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Palos Verdes Estates, California
Posts: 621
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 69 or 70

The Duke's '69 will never be as cool as Bill Hickman's black '68 in "Bullitt".
sub006 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts