Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2005, 04:47 PM   #121
01L2Cobra
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
01L2Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Who cares about the new V6 when they could use the new 3.2 litre inline six? The standard 3.2L I6 engine is expected to produce 240bhp with a turbo-charged version approaching 300bhp.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports
01L2Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 04:55 PM   #122
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Ford has fallen way behind ther is not any car out that is not able to be met, or beat by atleast 2 other cars.

Focus ST: SRT-4, Cobalt SS, new 06 Si
Taurus/Fusion: Intrepid, Maxima, Accord
Mustang: Magnum/Charger SRT8 and R/T, GTO, C6

the Magnum also has AWD option, the C6 is a 6spd, and the GTO/ Charger are more able to side as a family car/
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 05:18 PM   #123
01L2Cobra
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
01L2Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zx2srdotnet
and MANY places have laughed at people that are asking to buy a spot on the list for MSRP, so they will be in the range of 50-56k when they come out depending on the MSRP
Yep many people on the list are now being told by dealers that they will be looking at $10K over list due to dealer allocation.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports
01L2Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 05:25 PM   #124
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

hence why ther is a lot of people on SVTperformance.com that have pulled there names from the list.
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 05:26 PM   #125
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
*post that was above this disapeared*
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 05:28 PM   #126
TheStang00
AF Enthusiast
 
TheStang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zx2srdotnet
that last link doest work....

"gt500= 465 not 500. about 495 ft-lbs of tq. ur trying to down this car and you dont even know that?"

thats even more pathetic when a SC 4.6 will make over 480whp


"the 03/04 could run high 12s and the new gt500 is definatly faster than that car. in every aspect."

the 03/04 was actually more like 425HP so assuming Ford doesnt under rate the 06+ as much as that then we are still looking at a mid/high 12sec car. Just this time it dont handle near as good.



EDIT: WTF does a 3.5 have to do with teh GT500? If anythign the 3.5 SHOULD have come out like 5yrs ago now its just seen as Ford finaly catching up with everyone else.
dude... ARE YOU RETARDED?

cobra even posted stuff on this, they made it have less hp ON PURPOSE. they dont want it to be close the the ford gt in power... ITS INTENTIONAL, they got a big ass pulley on it. this just means it has tremendous potential. and it is much faster than the 03. more power, solid axle. its def faster, not only that but TESTS ACTUALLY PROVE IT HANDLES BETTER THAN THE 03!!

just like chevy made the leaf springs work well, ford worked with the solid axle and did some pretty impressive work.
TheStang00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 05:42 PM   #127
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStang00
dude... ARE YOU RETARDED?

cobra even posted stuff on this, they made it have less hp ON PURPOSE. they dont want it to be close the the ford gt in power... ITS INTENTIONAL, they got a big ass pulley on it. and it is much faster than the 03. more power, solid axle. its def faster, not only that but TESTS ACTUALLY PROVE IT HANDLES BETTER THAN THE 03!!

just like chevy made the leaf springs work well, ford worked with the solid axle and did some pretty impressive work.

no really? i thougth it was weaker UN-intentionaly . Way to state the fucking obious.

It's not going to be "much faster", much faster would make it mid 11's the GT weighs 400lbs less, and has about 85HP more and more TQ and Motor Trend could only get 11.7 out of it, so its easy to say a GT500 will only be about a 12.4-5.

I dont care WTF ford does, no one that actually like handleing will want to but a car w/ a solid rear it's just another example of Ford beating a dead horse. Hell I can put slicks and a 21m sway bar and get a .98g skidpad on my Escort. Thats almost on par w/ a NSX.

Unless the 2 cars are tested same day, and same tires, on same track/driver and all exit/enterance speeds are posted you will never get a fair comparison.
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 06:02 PM   #128
TheStang00
AF Enthusiast
 
TheStang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

I have nothing left to say to you...
TheStang00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 06:15 PM   #129
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStang00
I have nothing left to say to you...

Good.

465hp(even 500) SC 5.4 = under powered
3800lbs = WAY over heavy
reworked solid rear = still a solid rear
50k+ = EXTREMELY over priced


There is NO argument here these are proven facts. Any autoX person would prefer an IRS because it has MUCH more potential then a solid rear.

50K can get you better PROVEN car for less(C6)

3800lbs is a PIG of a car

a SC on a GT can make 480+WHP that more then 500 crank and would cost a shit load less then the GT500

Ford is offering NOTHING for a LOT of money
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 06:46 PM   #130
01L2Cobra
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
01L2Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zx2srdotnet
I dont care WTF ford does, no one that actually like handleing will want to but a car w/ a solid rear it's just another example of Ford beating a dead horse.
That’s true. HTT the new head of SVT still thinks its the 70's and we are all stuck in the same f*ed up time warp as him with mullets asking ourselves what’s a corner? But in typical fashion thanks to Fords over sights Maximum Motorsports has stepped up to the plate again.
http://www.autoblog.com/entry/1234000150066311/
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports
01L2Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 06:53 PM   #131
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

damn looks sweet
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 06:57 PM   #132
Jaguar D-Type
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zx2srdotnet
Ford has fallen way behind ther is not any car out that is not able to be met, or beat by atleast 2 other cars.

Focus ST: SRT-4, Cobalt SS, new 06 Si
Taurus/Fusion: Intrepid, Maxima, Accord
Mustang: Magnum/Charger SRT8 and R/T, GTO, C6

the Magnum also has AWD option, the C6 is a 6spd, and the GTO/ Charger are more able to side as a family car/
How does the pony-car Mustang compete with the sports car C6 and supercar-slaying Z06?

The Magnum is a 4,000+ lbs station wagon and the Charger also weighs 4,000+ lbs and has four doors. Both aren't available with manual transmissions.

How could a GTO be a family car? The new Mustang has a bigger trunk than the GTO. A new Mustang GT would be more affordable for a family than a GTO.

Also, the new Mustang has an aluminum hood.

There aren't many reviews of the new Fusion, but the December, 2005 issue of Motor Trend tests the new Fusion SEL vs. Honda Accord EX vs. Hyundai Sonata GLS vs. Toyota Camry LE

http://www.motortrend.com/toc/thismonth/
Jaguar D-Type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 07:00 PM   #133
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

If ford desides to go: gt, mach1 and cobra again I think it should be.

GT= 5spd, IRS(since the GT is typicly the car for people that just want a nice v8)

Mach1 = better N/A motor, 5spd(better 1/4 gearing), solid rear (mach1 is known as more of a straight line car)

Cobra = F/I, 6spd, IRS(maybe a solid option)
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 07:08 PM   #134
Jaguar D-Type
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2005 Steeda Mustang Takes American Iron Championship

check the links

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/artma...pionship.shtml

http://americanironracing.com/home
Jaguar D-Type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 07:32 PM   #135
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

have that driver drive a stock 05 then a stock 01 cobra (closest to the 05 in power and has an IRS) and see what the numbers are.

Like i said before you cant compair different drivers and different modifications.
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts