Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
12-02-2005, 06:15 PM | #61 | ||
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
You do know that the FR500C was the only car allowed to run a non production based engine? The M3 was limited to the 3.2 and OEM intake while the FR500C was permitted to use the Cammer and a racing intake. http://www.grandamerican.com/CONTENT...GAC%203-28.pdf Things would have been totally different if BMW was allowed to run the new 3 series with a V8.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports Last edited by 01L2Cobra; 12-02-2005 at 06:58 PM. |
||
12-02-2005, 06:27 PM | #62 | ||
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports Last edited by 01L2Cobra; 12-02-2005 at 06:58 PM. |
||
12-02-2005, 06:32 PM | #63 | ||
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports |
||
12-02-2005, 07:06 PM | #64 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS.
1. How do I attach a quote? That way I won't have to say "Hey Cobra guy." 2. Why the hell did this last page get so damn wide? I hate that, I feel like a damn typwriter when I scroll to the right, then left, then right, then left. THAT SUCKS!! Oh, by the way....Hey Stang 00...I do realize that having a 16k v8 Mustang is not possible today. However...why did they drop the 5.0 and 5.8 (pushrod engines)? They were VERY reliable, good power and great torque (could've been more if Ford used SVT/GT40-COBRA intake/heads). A friend of mine who works at a Ford dealership in the service dept. said that Ford did that because they were not selling enough replacement engines for the 5.0/5.8. True or not, I don't know. Knowing Ford it could be true. If Ford still had the 5.0/5.8 the Mustang would be alot cheaper than they are now. Think about it guys, less cams, less valves, and no, not less power. I know the 5.0 had 225 vs. 260(4.6 1999-04) but I'm sure if the 5.0 was still here after 10 years they would have improved on it. For example: base-200hp v6 3.8 or 4.0....I don't care which one base GT-300hp 5.0..no prob. w/bolt on stuff (SVT/GT40) GT premium-350hp 5.0...maybe a supercharger? COBRA-400+hp 5.8...bolt ons, heads, supercharger? I'm not doggin the 4.6 it's bottom end is stronger than the 5.0, but I don't see the benefit 10 years latter from switching to the modular 4.6. Gas mileage is about the same, power was the same til 99 (not much more) and 300 05. I almost envy GM guys cause they still have a pushrod engine (v8's) that they have room to work on it. I THINK THIS IS MY LONGEST POST...SORRY, I'LL GO IN TIMEOUT NOW. |
|
12-02-2005, 07:25 PM | #65 | |||
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
Quote:
About the only benefit to the mod motors (non DOHC) was to save money. It made it possible for them to share parts between brands and between the 4.6 and 5.4. The DOHC does offer a big benefit to people that enjoy Road racing like myself thanks the to increased RPMs and power band. It does have the disadvantage of size and weight however the 01 blocks are only 80lbs.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports Last edited by 01L2Cobra; 12-02-2005 at 09:03 PM. |
|||
12-02-2005, 09:11 PM | #66 | ||
Banned
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
ZX2 15.6(best i have personaly seen) ZX2 S/R 15.4 (again best i have personaly seen) 99+v6 15.6(again best i have personaly seen) best 05 time ican find on line stock is a 15.2 unless its a 05+ then a ZX2 can meet or beat any stock v6 stang. Its a fact of life. Learn it. Live it. |
||
12-02-2005, 09:24 PM | #67 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
Did it work? Let's see. |
||
12-02-2005, 09:25 PM | #68 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
HEY, ALRIGHT!! You learn something new everyday!
THANK YOU COBRA!! |
|
12-02-2005, 09:38 PM | #69 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I see what you're sayin ZX2 but, come on, which looks better? Which one is more fun to drive? It's been a long time since I've driven either a ZX2 or 99-04 v6 Stang so I really can't remember how they performed. I know the Stang would have more off the line but I also know that the wieght of the Escort would help it once it got going. That is evident by the times you showed us. I know we should like the quicker time no matter how we get it but I think the Stang would be more fun in a drag race. I'm sure the Escort can handle/brake better with its lighter wieght on a road course, but I think you guys are talking about drag racing. Sorry man, not doggin ya or anything, it's just your prefferance and our prefferance. You do get better gas mileage and you can go through the snow, which that would be nice, but for a sports car I'd rather have RWD.
|
|
12-02-2005, 09:56 PM | #70 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
ok crub weight of escort 2500lbs, mustang v6 3050lbs.
that is a pretty good difference. power- escort 130hp, 135tq. mustang v6 190hp, 220tq. so the mustang has %46 more hp and 63% more tq. or in otherwords, a lot more. plus its RWD. I cant see a stock escort beating a stock manual v6 stang. but the weight dif would help a lot. and i must say i def agree with giddyup50's points and theres also the tq factor... its nice to actually have some low end... |
|
12-02-2005, 10:08 PM | #71 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
but i to like ohv engines, i have my 3.8, and even tho the ranger has no power, i like the 2.5 in it also. extremely reliable engines. and really the ranger engine has more potential than my 3.8 v6, its the same motor except bored some that was in the SVO mustang. can take boat loads of boost. and has a hefty aftermarket. |
||
12-02-2005, 10:08 PM | #72 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
YOU LIKE ME...YOU REALLY REALLY LIKE ME!! clear my throat.....sorry guys...just kiddin again I think I picked the wrong week to quite smokin crack JUST KIDDIN AGAIN GUYS....GEE WHIZ, CALM DOWN! |
||
12-02-2005, 10:10 PM | #73 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
edit- damn ive become a post whore |
||
12-02-2005, 10:26 PM | #74 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
We're all post whores, I keep saying I'm going to bed but I keep posting. |
||
12-03-2005, 12:12 AM | #75 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?
Quote:
|
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|