Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-02-2005, 06:15 PM   #61
01L2Cobra
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
01L2Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaguar D-Type
That proves absolutely nothing!!!

You do know that the FR500C was the only car allowed to run a non production based engine? The M3 was limited to the 3.2 and OEM intake while the FR500C was permitted to use the Cammer and a racing intake.
http://www.grandamerican.com/CONTENT...GAC%203-28.pdf

Things would have been totally different if BMW was allowed to run the new 3 series with a V8.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports

Last edited by 01L2Cobra; 12-02-2005 at 06:58 PM.
01L2Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 06:27 PM   #62
01L2Cobra
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
01L2Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaguar D-Type
The Austrailan Ford Falcon should be built here.
Yes the Falcon is a great car as is the Focus RS and many other cars that Ford produces for over seas markets. The problem is that we are stuck with water downed versions or crap they claim is better than it is. Like I posted above Ford will tell you to look at Grand-AM cup but they fail to tell you they had more advantages than any other manufacturer in the series.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports

Last edited by 01L2Cobra; 12-02-2005 at 06:58 PM.
01L2Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 06:32 PM   #63
01L2Cobra
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
01L2Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshta
Too much love in here.

Yes the new S7 is insanely bad and when i win the lottery i will own one. Not arguing but 0-60 in 2.8 out of 450hp seems a little much. The Enzo ran 3-3 with 650hp, given it does weigh 3200lbs but come on. A 2.8 would throw it in the S7 range and run 1/4 at mid-high 10s. It would theoretically have to weight about 1770lbs.
Why spend all that money on that when you can get a 2.9 0-60 car for $40K?
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports
01L2Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 07:06 PM   #64
giddyup50
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS.

1. How do I attach a quote? That way I won't have to say "Hey Cobra guy."

2. Why the hell did this last page get so damn wide? I hate that, I feel like a damn typwriter when I scroll to the right, then left, then right, then left. THAT SUCKS!!

Oh, by the way....Hey Stang 00...I do realize that having a 16k v8 Mustang is not possible today. However...why did they drop the 5.0 and 5.8 (pushrod engines)? They were VERY reliable, good power and great torque (could've been more if Ford used SVT/GT40-COBRA intake/heads). A friend of mine who works at a Ford dealership in the service dept. said that Ford did that because they were not selling enough replacement engines for the 5.0/5.8. True or not, I don't know. Knowing Ford it could be true.

If Ford still had the 5.0/5.8 the Mustang would be alot cheaper than they are now. Think about it guys, less cams, less valves, and no, not less power. I know the 5.0 had 225 vs. 260(4.6 1999-04) but I'm sure if the 5.0 was still here after 10 years they would have improved on it.

For example: base-200hp v6 3.8 or 4.0....I don't care which one
base GT-300hp 5.0..no prob. w/bolt on stuff (SVT/GT40)
GT premium-350hp 5.0...maybe a supercharger?
COBRA-400+hp 5.8...bolt ons, heads, supercharger?
I'm not doggin the 4.6 it's bottom end is stronger than the 5.0, but I don't see the benefit 10 years latter from switching to the modular 4.6.
Gas mileage is about the same, power was the same til 99 (not much more) and 300 05. I almost envy GM guys cause they still have a pushrod engine (v8's) that they have room to work on it.
I THINK THIS IS MY LONGEST POST...SORRY, I'LL GO IN TIMEOUT NOW.
giddyup50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 07:25 PM   #65
01L2Cobra
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
01L2Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by giddyup50
1. How do I attach a quote? That way I won't have to say "Hey Cobra guy."
hit the reply button under the post you want to quote or type [ QUOTE=name of the person or item you want to quote] type or past the quote here then type [ /QUOTE] but leave out the space between the [ and the Q and /

Quote:
Originally Posted by giddyup50
2. Why the hell did this last page get so damn wide? I hate that, I feel like a damn typwriter when I scroll to the right, then left, then right, then left. THAT SUCKS!!
When TheStang00 quoted my post with the picture of the Focus RS his post became too wide so it activated the left/right scroll bar

About the only benefit to the mod motors (non DOHC) was to save money. It made it possible for them to share parts between brands and between the 4.6 and 5.4. The DOHC does offer a big benefit to people that enjoy Road racing like myself thanks the to increased RPMs and power band. It does have the disadvantage of size and weight however the 01 blocks are only 80lbs.
__________________
The ///M stands for Motorsports

Last edited by 01L2Cobra; 12-02-2005 at 09:03 PM.
01L2Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 09:11 PM   #66
zx2srdotnet
Banned
 
zx2srdotnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brookhaven, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zx2srdotnet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStang00
also, no stock escort in 99 is going to beat a stock manual v6 stang from 99 period.
lol now THAT'S bull shit

ZX2 15.6(best i have personaly seen)
ZX2 S/R 15.4 (again best i have personaly seen)
99+v6 15.6(again best i have personaly seen)

best 05 time ican find on line stock is a 15.2

unless its a 05+ then a ZX2 can meet or beat any stock v6 stang.

Its a fact of life. Learn it. Live it.
zx2srdotnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 09:24 PM   #67
giddyup50
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01L2Cobra
hit the reply button under the post you want to quote or type [ QUOTE=name of the person or item you want to quote] type or past the quote here then type [ /QUOTE] but leave out the space between the [ and the Q and /


When TheStang00 quoted my post with the picture of the Focus RS his post became too wide so it activated the left/right scroll bar

About the only benefit to the mod motors (non DOHC) was to save money. It made it possible for them to share parts between brands and between the 4.6 and 5.4. The DOHC does offer a big benefit to people that enjoy Road racing like myself thanks the to increased RPMs and power band. It does have the disadvantage of size and weight however the 01 blocks are only 80lbs.

Did it work? Let's see.
giddyup50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 09:25 PM   #68
giddyup50
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
HEY, ALRIGHT!! You learn something new everyday!
THANK YOU COBRA!!
giddyup50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 09:38 PM   #69
giddyup50
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I see what you're sayin ZX2 but, come on, which looks better? Which one is more fun to drive? It's been a long time since I've driven either a ZX2 or 99-04 v6 Stang so I really can't remember how they performed. I know the Stang would have more off the line but I also know that the wieght of the Escort would help it once it got going. That is evident by the times you showed us. I know we should like the quicker time no matter how we get it but I think the Stang would be more fun in a drag race. I'm sure the Escort can handle/brake better with its lighter wieght on a road course, but I think you guys are talking about drag racing. Sorry man, not doggin ya or anything, it's just your prefferance and our prefferance. You do get better gas mileage and you can go through the snow, which that would be nice, but for a sports car I'd rather have RWD.
giddyup50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 09:56 PM   #70
TheStang00
AF Enthusiast
 
TheStang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

ok crub weight of escort 2500lbs, mustang v6 3050lbs.

that is a pretty good difference.

power- escort 130hp, 135tq. mustang v6 190hp, 220tq.

so the mustang has %46 more hp and 63% more tq.

or in otherwords, a lot more. plus its RWD. I cant see a stock escort beating a stock manual v6 stang. but the weight dif would help a lot.

and i must say i def agree with giddyup50's points

and theres also the tq factor... its nice to actually have some low end...
TheStang00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 10:08 PM   #71
TheStang00
AF Enthusiast
 
TheStang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by giddyup50
I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS.


Oh, by the way....Hey Stang 00...I do realize that having a 16k v8 Mustang is not possible today. However...why did they drop the 5.0 and 5.8 (pushrod engines)? They were VERY reliable, good power and great torque (could've been more if Ford used SVT/GT40-COBRA intake/heads). A friend of mine who works at a Ford dealership in the service dept. said that Ford did that because they were not selling enough replacement engines for the 5.0/5.8. True or not, I don't know. Knowing Ford it could be true.

If Ford still had the 5.0/5.8 the Mustang would be alot cheaper than they are now. Think about it guys, less cams, less valves, and no, not less power. I know the 5.0 had 225 vs. 260(4.6 1999-04) but I'm sure if the 5.0 was still here after 10 years they would have improved on it.
yep those engines were reliable and nice. i think ford switched to the ohc motors to move on technologically. think about it, ohc motors have been the trend as of recent, gm and dodge are the only companies that still use ohv at all. and they have there fair share of ohc motors also. i think ford was just following that trend, i think they realized the potential of ohc (mainly dohc) motors. the 4.6 really is there first try at it. in the future ill be willing to bet theyll have a much better ohc v8. something that will compete with or kill the ls1. but we'll see.

but i to like ohv engines, i have my 3.8, and even tho the ranger has no power, i like the 2.5 in it also. extremely reliable engines. and really the ranger engine has more potential than my 3.8 v6, its the same motor except bored some that was in the SVO mustang. can take boat loads of boost. and has a hefty aftermarket.
TheStang00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 10:08 PM   #72
giddyup50
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStang00
ok crub weight of escort 2500lbs, mustang v6 3050lbs.

that is a pretty good difference.

power- escort 130hp, 135tq. mustang v6 190hp, 220tq.

so the mustang has %46 more hp and 63% more tq.

or in otherwords, a lot more. plus its RWD. I cant see a stock escort beating a stock manual v6 stang. but the weight dif would help a lot.

and i must say i def agree with giddyup50's points

and theres also the tq factor... its nice to actually have some low end...

YOU LIKE ME...YOU REALLY REALLY LIKE ME!!
clear my throat.....sorry guys...just kiddin again
I think I picked the wrong week to quite smokin crack
JUST KIDDIN AGAIN GUYS....GEE WHIZ, CALM DOWN!
giddyup50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 10:10 PM   #73
TheStang00
AF Enthusiast
 
TheStang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01L2Cobra
When TheStang00 quoted my post with the picture of the Focus RS his post became too wide so it activated the left/right scroll bar
wasnt it like that on your original too? i thought it was, if you go back in look it doesnt fit either. for that matter neither does the shebly gt350 jaguar posted either.

edit- damn ive become a post whore
TheStang00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 10:26 PM   #74
giddyup50
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStang00
wasnt it like that on your original too? i thought it was, if you go back in look it doesnt fit either. for that matter neither does the shebly gt350 jaguar posted either.

edit- damn ive become a post whore

We're all post whores, I keep saying I'm going to bed but I keep posting.
giddyup50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 12:12 AM   #75
neatofrito1618
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seminole
Posts: 952
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to neatofrito1618 Send a message via Yahoo to neatofrito1618
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What’s wrong with Ford and the new Mustang?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zx2srdotnet
lol now THAT'S bull shit

ZX2 15.6(best i have personaly seen)
ZX2 S/R 15.4 (again best i have personaly seen)
99+v6 15.6(again best i have personaly seen)

best 05 time ican find on line stock is a 15.2

unless its a 05+ then a ZX2 can meet or beat any stock v6 stang.

Its a fact of life. Learn it. Live it.
what u have seen at the track doesent mean anything. 99-04 v6 5 speeds can run low 15's
neatofrito1618 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts