Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
12-20-2003, 06:09 PM | #31 | |
AF Regular
|
Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
I loved the first one after that I just started wanting to throttle him... maybe he'll trip and fall down some stairs tonight... :sigh:
DoubleTap |
|
12-20-2003, 07:11 PM | #32 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
Quote:
|
||
12-21-2003, 11:03 AM | #33 | |
Banned
Thread starter
|
Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
thanks Spectre927 ....Oh yeah..I just bought an Intercooler intead of AEM cold air intake...the intercooler is better??? more booste?
|
|
12-21-2003, 11:06 AM | #34 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,591
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
Quote:
|
||
12-21-2003, 11:27 AM | #35 | |
Banned
Thread starter
|
Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
nah..you got me wrong there..It's an used intercooler and that dude he bought a new one so he gave me for a street price...so can i put it into my Crx?
|
|
12-21-2003, 11:28 AM | #36 | |
Banned
Thread starter
|
Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
and any good thing about it???
|
|
12-21-2003, 12:11 PM | #37 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pittsburg, California
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
there has been no research done on comparing a cai vs. an intercooler and it would be really stupid if there was. as far as boost, there will be none since u don't have a turbocharger. the purpose of the intercooler is to cool the air coming from the turbine which can be hot due to the high temp exhaust waste making the the turbo and air being compressed hotter. in your case all u are doing is making cold air just a tiny bit colder if even that since it can only cool air to a certain extent.
oh i forgot the good thing about it. well you've now got the intercooler might as well get the rest of the turbo kit. |
|
12-21-2003, 12:18 PM | #38 | |
Banned
Thread starter
|
Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
oh so it's good to have an intercooler that installed in your car and next go for turbo...
|
|
12-21-2003, 12:29 PM | #39 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pittsburg, California
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
Quote:
|
||
12-21-2003, 12:43 PM | #40 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
WTF??? this guy is going to put in an intercooler with no turbo??? an intercooler is meant for turbo, not naturally aspired vehicles. ::cough RICER cough::
|
|
12-21-2003, 01:01 PM | #41 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pittsburg, California
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeah i hate to say it, but until he has a turbo kit installed then that places him in my ricer category, kinda like people who put those fake bov sound in their cars.
|
|
12-21-2003, 03:59 PM | #42 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,591
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
Quote:
Here's some advice: |
||
12-21-2003, 04:25 PM | #43 | |
Banned
Thread starter
|
Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
Did you guy ever tried to put an intercooler into your car instead of air intake? or you can connect the pipe from the intake manifo... to the intercooler..and it increase more air..
|
|
12-21-2003, 04:57 PM | #44 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,591
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
you're a fucking moron, you're not increasing anything except the empty space in your wallet
|
|
12-21-2003, 05:08 PM | #45 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: AEM intakes vs.. Intercooler...
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|