Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
View Poll Results: Camaro SS or Mustang Cobra | |||
Camaro | 76 | 59.38% | |
Mustang | 52 | 40.63% | |
Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
04-03-2002, 03:23 AM | #136 | |
AF Regular
|
Hmm...I bought what i wanted, and I'm beating Camaros...
__________________
<---2000 Mustang GT convertible...but no slouch. Possesses Vortech SQ supercharger, custom exhaust, 3.73s, custom suspension, 18X9.5 cobra R's, and others to boot. Give me liberty...or give me death??? |
|
04-03-2002, 11:58 AM | #137 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well with the 4.6 4V i have in my car right at this time,i dont have it supercharged just better exhaust and i was walking all over camaros. Weird,i thought they were so much faster? My engine at a smaller size and hardly been touched up for added power out runs the big almighty 5.7? Gettin mad? no i never got mad in that last writting ive gotten more looks and comments from my cobra than i ever had when i had my camaro. How it looks better sounds better,and for the people ive raced including SS and WS6's and have beaten them who have also said how nice my car is...hmmm pityful as for the focus...it was designed for econo rice burningand it seems to have no problem beating the honda civics or what ever else you wanna throw against it in its class. SVT focus 17,000 les than that of a civic Si and beats and focus comes with a 6 speed..pityful suuure..whatever you say..
|
|
04-03-2002, 12:51 PM | #138 | |
Oldie
|
Prob because they had slush boxes, without the high-stall torque converters dragsters use. So there goes a half second. So you would win.
OK, to see who is faster over these great distances, put up a scanned time slip, that will be good enough proof.
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
|
04-03-2002, 12:53 PM | #139 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Camaros are faster. Ill supercharge my car then you wont beat mine rest assure you that. |
||
04-03-2002, 01:15 PM | #140 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
and thats where the GM cars are even faster. Yea, your car may sound better, but look better?, not, its anyones opionion on that, but here I get more comments on my camaro than I ever did on my slow 95 GT. As for the Focus, its almost 300 more dollars than the Civic Si but it is faster, but it isnt as fast as the Nissan Sentra SER Spec V. and that is mainlywhat I was comparing it too. Ford dosent have anything else besides a truck that is fast but that is why Ford sucks cause they have nothing to compete with Nissan and others ect. But Please guys this is getting old now, we know which car,Camaro or Mustang which is faster, so why do you want to try and prove they are not? |
||
04-03-2002, 02:28 PM | #141 | |
Banned
|
Its just too bad there will no longer be the beautifull camero or trans am. It really sux that the only real domestic teen sports car will be the crapstang
|
|
04-12-2002, 02:23 AM | #142 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well call my car a freak from the factory or something but Ive put it to 160 as said on my speedometer, stock chip mind you..so you tell me, I have a 99 Cobra, the supposed messed up year of the cobra. But wait its a cobra!!! its not supposed to go 160. My sisters boyfriend who owns a 98 z28 ls1 saw for his very own eyes and checked to make sure it was a stock chip after we were done. Kodak momment peoples when i saw his face after he looked.
Just another cobra huh? |
|
04-12-2002, 02:25 AM | #143 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
One more thing. since we are talking straight from the factory which is faster,well the 03 cobra still wins!!!!!
|
|
04-12-2002, 01:58 PM | #144 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Goodies for you and your Mustang. But still the 2003 is supercharged.
2003 may be faster, but then it will have to start competing with the Corvette if the Mustang price goes up any more. It doesnt matter anyway Mustangs sucked from 1994 to 1998 when the Camaro didnt. |
|
04-12-2002, 10:50 PM | #145 | ||
Missing in action
|
Quote:
|
||
04-17-2002, 12:45 PM | #147 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 SVT Lightning - Pullied & tuned...391 rwhp / 498 rwtq 8.47 @ 83.43...1.99 60' on Goodyear F1's. 1991 LX - 8.36 @ 83.13...1.82 60' Shooting for 8.10's or better w/ stock heads, a shit cam and a factory production intake. |
||
04-17-2002, 02:08 PM | #148 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Forget it black. I dont think they are bad, I was just more less
talking bout the performance (stock) vs. the new ones. Overall though they are quite nice.:flash: |
|
04-18-2002, 10:59 AM | #149 | |
Oldie
|
Either car is better than an 84 hon-duh with a 5-inch pipe. I think we can all agree on that
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
|
04-18-2002, 11:52 AM | #150 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Amen to that!!!!
In the end its all about american.:smoker2: |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Thread Tools | |
|
|