Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
08-02-2001, 02:58 PM | #1 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
New Cadillac CTS
Preview: '03 Cadillac CTS
The Car Connection has a preview article of the new CTS. This is the car found in the movie Matrix2 and will replace the Catera. Its not a bad looking car. |
|
08-04-2001, 09:49 AM | #2 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
In this months Automobile magazine there is a nice write up on the new CTS. Sounds like even they are impressed. If you havent seen the interior of the car, you need to. It looks amazing and it doesnt look like a copy of the Lexus/Audi interiors which seem to be popular today. Its got STYLE and I love it!
Now, if they can just find a decent ad agency to push the product.... |
|
08-06-2001, 09:59 AM | #3 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Please answer
What is "Art and Science"?
It is a new design way, isnt it. i`m not from USA. Please tell about this... |
|
08-07-2001, 07:18 PM | #4 | |
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i don't really like how it looks, it looks really tall
|
|
08-07-2001, 07:28 PM | #5 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: washington area, Washington
Posts: 855
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
not bad -- for a caddy
|
|
08-08-2001, 01:16 PM | #6 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: -
Posts: 910
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
08-08-2001, 11:05 PM | #7 | |
Old Mod
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: None
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I don't agree that Cadillac's history makes up for the flaws of today. Cadillac can be divided into three companies, in my opinion.
There's the 1903-1942 version. Cadillac was the "Standard of the World." It was a truly aspirational brand where you dreamed of getting behind the wheel of a V12 or V16 beauty. It was so impressive, that they came out with the LaSalle brand so that people could have a Cadillac without the cost (and the exclusivity). There's the 1946-1970s version. By the mid-1970s, much of the allure had worn off the Wreath and Crest. The post-war era had lots of influence on the market and industry from the 1949 tailfins and the Eldorado Biarritz of 1957...it was still aspirational, but much more attainable. Then, there's the current version. They rebadged a Chevy Nova as a Cadillac. They rebadged a Chevy Cavalier as a Cadillac. They rebadged an Opel as a Cadillac. Worst of all, they rebadged a Chevy truck (okay, it's actually a GMC Denali, but you get the point) as a Cadillac. There was a point in the late 1980s when the DeVille was listed in the top ten of sales in the US...not top ten luxury cars, top ten of ALL CARS SOLD! Exclusivity went right out the window. Today's Cadillacs are not balanced out by the past, they're dragging it down. Granted, the DTS is an impressive car compared to what the brand has had in the past quarter century, but it's not even close to the pre-war cars. It's sad, really. |
|
08-09-2001, 12:47 AM | #8 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: washington area, Washington
Posts: 855
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i don't care for caddies. just like.. maybe you don't care for pagani's or audi's or something
|
|
09-10-2001, 04:33 PM | #9 | ||
Oldie
|
Quote:
Teh CTS looks to be very good, but it needs more power, whcih will be dealt with. Its biggest let down is teh turn signal and wiper stalks, they are a HUGE sore-eye in the gorgeous interior.
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|