Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
10-13-2008, 09:56 AM | #1 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: mayfield, Ohio
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
turbo questions
i was looking for to learn a little more about turbo efficiency ratings and i stumbled onto a forum where someone asked a bunch of questions and no one replied but i thought most of them were really good questions and was wondering if anyone could answer any of them for me. it was...
i am not sure if i am allowed to take what i found and paste it into this forum and if i am not allowed i am sorry and you can just delete this post "I have been reading up a little on FI and it occurred to me that there ought to be some difference in the quality of Turbo vs SC boost. I’m just going throw out some assumptions that make sense to me and would love to get any feedback rooted in real experience and practice. Sorry of some of the questions are obvious but it can be a little tricky to find detailed information on this on the net, at least for me. 1.Well first of all SC would have nothing have no turbine in the flow of exhaust so one would expect backpressure on engine with turbo to be higher proportional to the amount of boost. a. Does that mean that turbo engine will have slightly more trouble with scavenging exhaust from the cylinders thus leading to higher heat buildup and intake charge dilution? b. Can SC engine be further enhanced by tuning the exhaust help scavenging via exhaust pulse timing (ugh, can’t remember the name of the effect)? If so, is this done and how significant are the gains? 2. Twin screw SC as well as rotos blower, at low boosts, are as or more efficient, in terms of adding heat to the charge, as turbo. However turbo is hooked up directly to the exhaust plumbing. Does the turbo efficiency rating take into account whatever heat seep you would get that fact or is it purely impeller efficiency rating? 3. It seems like it wouldn’t take a lot of tq to drive the compressor/blower so I would expect the ratio of tq to hp be higher on sc engine vs turbo engine while turbo would naturally have higher hp pound for pound of boost. 4. Specifically in RedShift SC thread it was mentioned at some point that it would be possible to control the boost per gear if real tuning options were available. While this can be done easily in turbo via waste gate manipulations how can this be done with SC particularly one placed after TB? 5. What ARE FI cams exactly? Do they just have more valve overlap to use the boost for a little blow through? If so are injectors usually tuned to fire with a little more delay after valve open to prevent blowing threw fuel? 6. This is a little general but with higher tq and hp output per rpm do oil/water/steering pumps become linearly better at doing their work or does it make sense to under drive them to the power level that they would see on a stock engine? Are there any other differences in “quality” of SC vs Turbo boost or tuning directions taken with them? Thanks for any comments that will bring further insight!" |
|
10-13-2008, 12:24 PM | #2 | ||||||||
Professional Ninja Killer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Penn Hills, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: turbo questions
Quote:
a- its not so much that it has trouble, its that it should be avoided. In an NA (naturally aspirated) engine, the scavenging helps pull fresh intake charge in using the inertia of the exiting exhaust. In a forced induction engine, the positive intake pressure does far more than scavenging could hope to do so its not necessary. It should be avoided because the positive pressure in the manifold will only serve to blow air and fuel directly out the exhaust valve during overlap. Not only does that reduce performance by (in effect) making a leak, it will raise EGT and cook turbos and converters. b- I'll add my 2 cents, but I'm not really an expert on SC exhausts. With a turbo, you basically want no backpressure at all after the turbine. The more freely the exhaust flows after the turbo, the better. It has done all of its job and just needs to get out of the way. The same is true of a diesel -even without a turbo- because there is no overlap with almost all diesels. No overlap = no scavenging. With an SC, I would assume you don't really want a lot of overlap because (just like the turbo) you would be making a leak and blowing part of your intake charge directly out the exhaust. Quote:
Quote:
As far as where it makes tq and hp is all in the tune. You can tune a turbo or SC to make all of its boost by 2000 rpms, or tune it so that it makes almost none until 6000. Quote:
An SC before the TB could be boost controlled with an electronically controlled blow off, but it would be pretty pointless to use crankshaft energy to make boost only to vent it off. It would be a waste of energy that would negate any benefits. This is one of the conundrums that has faced SC owners; a turbo is totally self-regulating once installed. More foot equals more boost. An SC is belt-driven, so it provides full potential at all times based on RPM. Quote:
Injector timing is not quite as much of a dark art as people think it is. When the injector fires has been shown to have very little effect on engine operation. Many port-EFI systems including GMs successful TPI used batch firing. There were only two injector events; the right bank would fire all four, then the left would fire all four. Sequential fire is a bit more complicated but has benefits in emissions. But for the DIY tuner, batch fire is perfectly viable. It basically injects fuel whenever, and it gets sucked in when the valve opens. The effective scavenging on most mildly cammed engines is minimal. It helps get things flowing, but the actual amount of raw fuel that gets sucked out the exhaust valve is neglegible. I've pulled apart enough batch-fire EFI heads to see that the residues on the valves and in the ports is very even which indicates that its all good despite injector firing at times that are a bit random. Modern engines use all kinds of tricks. Starting in the early 90s, most EFI was on its way to being sequential firing. In the early 2000's some started getting really sophisticated with multiple firings per stroke, injector pulsewidth modifications based on ignition feedback... they are so sophisticated now that they can read weak or strong cylinders and adjust fuel trim for each cylinder. BUT, most of that is for the sake of emissions and reliability. You might notice a tiny difference in drivability, but for the DIYer there is no reason to incorporate such lofty goals. Batch fire and be done Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Dragging people kicking and screaming into the enlightenment. |
||||||||
10-13-2008, 09:06 PM | #3 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: mayfield, Ohio
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: turbo questions
Wow, props to you for that great response. It was way more than I expected. Thanks. But I have one more question, I have heard of a really good book on turbocharging but I can’t remember the name… I remember it had the word boost in the name, any idea what the name of it is?
|
|
10-13-2008, 10:04 PM | #4 | |
Professional Ninja Killer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Penn Hills, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: turbo questions
Maximum Boost by Corky Bell
__________________
Dragging people kicking and screaming into the enlightenment. |
|
10-14-2008, 09:28 AM | #5 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: mayfield, Ohio
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: turbo questions
thanks again!
|
|
10-14-2008, 02:42 PM | #6 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: mayfield, Ohio
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: turbo questions
ok another question. turbo surge, can someone explain what it is and how its bad? i mean does it decrease boost alot and put the turbo way out of its most efficent range? or dammage the turbo? or both?
|
|
10-16-2008, 02:31 AM | #7 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Otago
Posts: 849
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: turbo questions
Quote:
The results are the boost builds up then blows back through the turbo and keeps doing it until the conditions change. It can cause serious damage to the turbo compressor blades, when the turbo blades have had enough they sometimes end up inside your engine. As you can imagine it's a situation you want to avoid. If you pick your turbo size properly then it's rarely an issue you'll come across. |
||
11-08-2008, 12:23 PM | #8 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Victoriaville
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: turbo questions
Hi everyone, it's my first post here
What an interesting thread and +1 on the great answer from curtis73. I may add a few interesting things On 1-b, Yes you can improve engine efficiency with a larger tuned header system, but it will change the engine cam timing requirements, reducing even further the overlap. Low pressure wave shall be present at the valve opening and no pressure wave should return until the valve closes. But it will not tune all the way trough like a NA system like Curtis pointed. +1 on batch firing, but IMO, too much overlap may lead to erratic fuel distribution witch is compensated in the VE tables. The fuel sits on the intake valve until it opens and is probably the first thing blown trough the exhaust during overlap witch add to the importance of selecting the right cam for the application. When WOT, the duty cycle of the injectors is longer than the time that the intake valve is opened, so it make little or no difference, where it could help is while crusing around town, squirting fuel while the exhaust is closed may help emissions and fuel consumption I have seen well tuned 5-6 psi systems using just RRFPR as fuel enrichment and a wideband O2 sensor as a mean of tune, 8 psi with boost retard, more with full standalone and higher octane fuel to about 15-19 PSI then fully built engines running insane boost levels that I would not drive I hope it make sense |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|