View Single Post
Old 07-26-2004, 03:54 PM   #10
RocketStang911
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: .
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 97' talon awd turbo vs. 97' stock mustang

Quote:
Originally Posted by MexSiR
Now, 99+ Mustangs are better looking, faster, and I would recommend one of those, just not the 94 - 98 models.
Yes pre 99 mustang gt autos are dogs stock but if you plan to mod them they are one car you wouldn't want to mess with.A few bolt on's like gears,exhaust and some good tires could get the car in the low 14's with a good driver.Thats as fast as a 99+ stang.And a 94-95 5.0 stang has a much bigger after market then the 99+ stangs but for out of the box power 99+ mustang hands down.

As far as the weight thing...put the 96-98 4.6 liter engine in a 2500 lb car and see what happens.

And for looks... it's personal oppinion.

lucki17 since you will plan to mod the car then get the stang.Believe me with H/C/I and a good S/C you can make 500-600 Rwhp! Loads of power with mods.Thats the good thing about a V-8 over a v-4.

BTW try to get a 5.0 mustang.Like kman said it has a bigger and cheaper aftermarket then the 4.6 mustangs.
RocketStang911 is offline   Reply With Quote