ok i have a dilemma.
i am torn between buying a 2007 Mazda 6-i http://www.autorevolution.com/dealers1/driscollmotorsnet/vehicle.cfm?vid=358757&selid=810&refby=dealersite

OR-

a 2007 Volvo S40 2.4i (http://www.autorevolution.com/dealers1/driscollmotorsnet/vehicle.cfm?vid=357617&selid=810&refby=dealersite)
http://www.autorevolution.com/dealers1/driscollmotorsnet/inventory.cfm?critcate=&critmake=Volvo

these cars only have $100 in difference, the mazda has about 62k miles, the volvo has about 82k miles.

i'm having a very hard time deciding which one to buy because i like them both. the volvo has leather interior and tint, while the mazda 6 has less miles.

which one who you guys pick and why? any pros and cons of each you guys can think of?

mazda 6 is much better than volvo s40,for the features were much better than the other car...

I have heard good things about the Mazda6 as well, and this is later into its lifespan so they had time to work out all the kinks. The Mazda would be roomier, sportier, and less expensive to maintain.

I'd have to agree with the other 2, the Mazda is a better car, and it having less miles just makes it an even better deal. the only things that would be better about the volvo is that its a little safer and might have AWD.

Your gonna get more bang for your buck with the mazda 6 not to mention that with the 6 you will have an easier time finding parts, both from the dealer and aftermarket.
Good Luck
Phil

not to bash mazda or anything, but my roommate drives one and wishes she didn't. she's had it since 2005 and it runs like a 10 year old car. mazda is all about aesthetics. sure it's fast and has a pretty sweet interior. s'got amber lights just like a bmw, but lacks in the reliability department.

.... yea they probably arn't on here anymore, just noticed it was already 5 months old when I posted after that guy :rofl: