|
|
rx7 vs. 240sxsnoopafellajv 08-05-2002, 02:52 PM Help me out on which is better Fliquer 08-05-2002, 03:04 PM Its not really fair to compare them. The RX-7 is a lot faster and handles a lot better than a 240sx, but they usually cost $10k more. You wouldnt compare a Supra to a celica now would you? Grendel 08-05-2002, 03:47 PM Are you talking about the latest RX7 or the older 80s ones? I would say its comparable to the 80s versions... 240sx is probably more reliable tho... -Grendel snoopafellajv 08-06-2002, 12:52 AM yea the 80's version to the early 90s 240sx Fliquer 08-06-2002, 01:29 PM Naturally aspirated RX7 FC's (86-91) were on a par with 240sx's performance wise. The RX7s handled a bit better. FC turbos were even better. NISSANSPDR 08-06-2002, 07:45 PM I'd go w/the 240SX vs. any RX7 b/c of the whole rotary factor. I'd rather not have to rebuild my engine every 50k miles or so... PISTONS!!! WOOHOO. vBulletin®, Copyright ©2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2009
|