rx7 vs. 240sx
snoopafellajv
08-05-2002, 01:52 PM
Help me out on which is better
Fliquer
08-05-2002, 02:04 PM
Its not really fair to compare them. The RX-7 is a lot faster and handles a lot better than a 240sx, but they usually cost $10k more. You wouldnt compare a Supra to a celica now would you?
Grendel
08-05-2002, 02:47 PM
Are you talking about the latest RX7 or the older 80s ones? I would say its comparable to the 80s versions... 240sx is probably more reliable tho...
-Grendel
-Grendel
snoopafellajv
08-05-2002, 11:52 PM
yea the 80's version to the early 90s 240sx
Fliquer
08-06-2002, 12:29 PM
Naturally aspirated RX7 FC's (86-91) were on a par with 240sx's performance wise. The RX7s handled a bit better. FC turbos were even better.
NISSANSPDR
08-06-2002, 06:45 PM
I'd go w/the 240SX vs. any RX7 b/c of the whole rotary factor. I'd rather not have to rebuild my engine every 50k miles or so...
PISTONS!!! WOOHOO.
PISTONS!!! WOOHOO.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2024