can anyone define is this turbo or non turbo nissan thank you


shit i cant attach photos how to do that??????

upload the photo... or host it at photobucket.com or some other web-sight...

www.imageshack.us

man i can't get over how many people don't know a good upload site... it takes like 3 seconds to find one in google search...

http://img228.imageshack.us/my.php?image=096556458x5yx.jpg can anybody difine this turbo or not?

yes that's a twin turbo

thank you so much

no problem man... find yourself a killer deal or something?

$1200 for this baby

that's insane? at an auction somewhere or something? man even if the body is in crap shape and the engine's blown you're still getting a HELL of a deal... that's sweet man.

thanks i love this car i've just sold my 3000gt and wanna try 300zx

What's wrong with it?

flood damage

probably could use a rebuild then... still, totally worth it:)

what is your opinion on zx if compare to 3000gt sl

a zx tt will whoop the shit outa an SL... as for a VR4 vs a ttzx, well a guy that goes by the name of yagus had the pleasure of driving both... he said that the zx was faster and scarier than the VR4

yeah, z32tt compared to the SL is nooo contest at all..

the SL 3kgt is comparable to the N/A Z32 with 230 HP if im not mistaken. so yeah a tt would WOOP SL ASS

a zx tt will whoop the shit outa an SL... as for a VR4 vs a ttzx, well a guy that goes by the name of yagus had the pleasure of driving both... he said that the zx was faster and scarier than the VR4

TTZX was definately faster but much more of a handful. A lot easier to kill yourself in. But my god that car was fast. I loved handing skylines their ass in that. It was so much fun.

The GTO (VR4) was much more forgiving and easier to push to its limits. And it was far more fun to cruise in. It also also wasnt in perfect running order either. The spark plugs were fouled and the boost solenoid was malfunctioning and only boosting 7psi instead of 11psi. So that would probably account for some of the speed difference. Im yet to go drive in it since that has been fixed.

SL's only came factory with "222HP" which is really doubtfull, becuase alot of mitsu owners have dyno'd their engines, and it'll come out around 205-210 HP (at the crank)

and is anybody dyno their Z????

check out www.itsgotturbo.com for 300zx dyno sheets...

SL's only came factory with "222HP" which is really doubtfull, becuase alot of mitsu owners have dyno'd their engines, and it'll come out around 205-210 HP (at the crank)
who the f*** pulled their engine to put it on an engine dyno?

the N/A usually dynos in the 180's to the wheels, stock.

the SL's are rated at 218hp to the crank correct?

typically a FWD will have less drivetrain loss than a RWD car because of the transaxle design.

so a 3000GT SL will get more power to the wheels but thise means absolutely nothing when it comes to performance aspect of these 2 cars. th RWD has the advantage in a drag race because of weight transfer and i am pretty sure the Z weighs slightly less. plus things like aerodynamics and suspension also play a roll in performance. i think everyone will agree that even in N/A form the RWD Z has the sports car edge while the SL is just more practical and a cruiser. my :2cents:

Pfft. I eat SL's for breakfast! :)

nice find dude, thats a great deal,

I meant dynoing the car, not the engine my fault... yea in 1997+ the SL's engine was rated at 218 BHP... but for 91-96' it was rated at 222...

I meant dynoing the car, not the engine my fault... yea in 1997+ the SL's engine was rated at 218 BHP... but for 91-96' it was rated at 222...

why the 4hp cut? what was the SOHC rated at? when did they start making the DOHC? when did they switch to the 4 bearing main?