all i have to say is that i read that a 3.4 liter camaro cant touch a gt well i smoked a 98 gt mustang it was only like 1 1/2 cars but i beat him both stock both automatic but i won

thats :bs: , theres no way your stock 3.4 liter camaro would come close to touching a 98 mustang gt, whether it was automatic or not :loser:

Eh, that GT was in the bad years of the 4.6 when it was still finding itself. If it happened it happened. If you did beat him though his engine wasn't running 100%.

I can believe a 4th gen. 200 HP 3.8L V6 Camaro beating a '94-'98 Mustang GT, but I have trouble believing that a 3.4L could do it, both stock and automatic.

Agreed, the 98 was a bad year but still well enough to off to take down a 3.4 camaro. This is either BS or the GT wasn't racing.

i dont think those mustang transmissions are exactly the best... i know the 4L60E is much better(from what i hear)...

The mustangs transmission would definately benefit from a shift kit, its strong but sluggish. I think the GT would win hands down against a 3.4 liter though. If it was the 3.8 it would be almost believable.

How about this? Both cars suck, who cares?

You or you wouldn't have checked out the thread.

Why buy a V6 Camaro? I don't care if you beat him you bought a Camaro and didn't buy the V8, thats disappointing in itself

oooh,

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v294/flatlander757/Misc/owned30.jpg

maybe he was running on 6 or 7 cylinders? was the driver 400+ lbs?