This is for the '91 - '99 SR20DE engine.

$120 (OBO) + shipping

I purchased it a month ago and had it delivered to my parent's house in So. Cal. and its been sitting there in the box ever since. The plan was to install it over Spring Break, but now I've changed plans.

I can ship it out as soon as I receive payment and get back home(on the 22nd). Paypal is preferred, but other payment methods will be accepted. I'll be checking this thread frequently, but I can also be reached via PM or email (kheetar@uclink.berkeley.edu).

You have mail and Private Message

You've got more mail!

Now YOU've got mail. ;)

NOTE : I will be accepting offers until one week from now, Thursday the 21st at midnight. Then arrangements will be made with the buyer so that they receive it as soon as possible.

Currently, the best offer is $100.

Now the best offer is $115.

BTW If someone offers me my asking price and can get me a 50% deposit I will end this and sell it to them.

SOLD

Is the POP better than a K&N?:alien: :bloated: :licker: :smoka: :flash:

If you're referring to the K&N drop-in filter, yes, the POP is better. It replaces the restrictive intake box with a large-element filter, allowing for better intake flow and more HP.

If you're referring to a universal round K&N filter with MAF adapter, like the one on ebay, I really couldn't tell you for sure which is better. The auctioneer here (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1813418265) is claiming a 6 HP increase. I tend to take everything I read on ebay with a grain of salt, though.

The JWT POP Charger and $tillen's copy of it both come with a MAF adapter with a radiused inlet like this:http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/jfilter.jpg
The radiused inlet helps to prevent turbulent flow through the MAF which can cause problems. So, in that sense, the POP is better.

In conclusion, the K&N may produce power(because it has a larger filter element), but since it lacks the design features of the POP, I wouldn't want it on my car.