CRX or MK III

which is overall better crx or mkIII. by this i mean overall performance and stuff and wich would be stronger this means aftermarket. i know ff is not as good as fr in circuit or auto x. the mkIII is alot heavier and the crx is light. which would have better handling, that is a major factor for me.

common sense would say supra...but it all depends on what ur trin to do with the car....both car are so different....

if you're talking about the supra, this car has waaay more options than a CRX.

That's rather obvious, I mean - You wouldn't ask if a NSX is better than MR2, right?

cu

i know that crx is not as good as supra, but in handling its hard to tell which is better. the supra is fr and real heavy, and the crx is light and ff. its obvouse ff is not as good as fr but with a heavy car it might be reald hard to handle, especially on the race track.

i know that crx is not as good as supra, but in handling its hard to tell which is better. the supra is fr and real heavy, and the crx is light and ff. its obvouse ff is not as good as fr but with a heavy car it might be reald hard to handle, especially on the race track.


depends on your driving style. :nono:

Supra all the way. CRX's are a joke. Aftermarket for the CRX is huge. But still overall the supra is ten times the car the CRX will ever be

the crx is a rather good solo2 car.