|
|
English Motherf*cker, can you read it?SiGNAL748 05-31-2004, 05:52 PM Accdornig to a rseearcher at an Enlgsih Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer are in teh rghit pclae. The rset can be a totall mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? On wtih teh sohw! :evillol: :loser: pro3racer 05-31-2004, 05:56 PM hey, thats cool, i could read that whole paragraph and not be confused. It's sad people spend all that time finding that "new infomation", where can that actually be used in real life, i dunno! freakray 05-31-2004, 05:57 PM Can people please quit with posting this. After the 8th time it was really getting old.... lakerfan1784 05-31-2004, 06:07 PM :iagree: Ace$nyper 05-31-2004, 06:10 PM never heard that before no wait i have alot....... FireBball972 05-31-2004, 06:11 PM ^ :1: Raz_Kaz 05-31-2004, 06:17 PM Hey we actually had that to study in our english class....back in grade 8. Still pretty neat to see it l33tc4k30fd00m 05-31-2004, 07:35 PM Heh that's kinda spooky. :screwy: I want my mum. :uhoh: YogsVR4 05-31-2004, 07:57 PM sutpid siht 93rollaracer 05-31-2004, 07:58 PM o hell...they even put something like that in Import Tuner a few months back...let it die already knorwj 05-31-2004, 08:02 PM Accdornig to a rseearcher at an Enlgsih Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer are in teh rghit pclae. The rset can be a totall mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? On wtih teh sohw! :evillol: :loser: yeah teh in place of the does not work according to this theory... other than that good job on the writing Amish_kid 05-31-2004, 08:41 PM rpseot :icon16: Jay! 05-31-2004, 08:50 PM You guys sure do suck at spelling... RSX-S777 05-31-2004, 08:57 PM It's a good thing this is true, otherwise it would be damn near impossible to decipher certain posts around here... Sluttypatton 05-31-2004, 09:42 PM I get the feeling that many of the posters on this forum are involved in research pertaining to this very subject. -Davo 05-31-2004, 10:09 PM this is OLD news. That thing circiled the internet over a year ago. GTmike400 06-01-2004, 12:11 AM :repost: x10^999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999 ImolaEK 06-01-2004, 12:44 PM CORNY :loser: SiGNAL748 06-01-2004, 07:42 PM :sorry: Oz 06-01-2004, 11:06 PM Ty. Jimster 06-01-2004, 11:12 PM kthxbye kelcdo vBulletin®, Copyright ©2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2009
|