Vr4 vs 93 RX7 TT

i asked this already but thought i would ask here since its the RX7 forum.

a track...the rex whoud murder the vr4
a strip....vr4 might win

they are to different cars for two different purposes. Go to the comparison forum to get more non-bias answers.

what makes you think we know anything about the vr-4? I happen to know a little acctually but seriously, this is an rx-7 board... we don't care about vr-4's cuz its not lightweight and rear wheel drive.... oh and it doesn't have a rotary... yea its pretty much just not as cool as an rx-7

what makes you think we know anything about the vr-4? I happen to know a little acctually but seriously, this is an rx-7 board... we don't care about vr-4's cuz its not lightweight and rear wheel drive.... oh and it doesn't have a rotary... yea its pretty much just not as cool as an rx-7

Soyo + Bias = THAT

ok.

lmao :rofl:

hey well thanks for nothing guys

I love you too

:evillol:
but seriously though go to the car comparison forum for answers on that question.

how about a geo with its 3 rotor i mean 3 banger?

*Confuse*^^^ :uhoh:

:banhim:

:naughty:

heh im just playin guys settle

i love u guys :jump3:

I have never seen a VR-4 beat a 3rd gen....VR-4's are HEAVY....they're fat bloated pigs, like a camaro or Mustang.....3rd gen all the way, lightweight, 50/50 weight ratio, mid engine, twin turbo, RWD, and a rotary....with a combo like that how can you lose, yes again the piston car loses.

mid engine eh? whatever you say buddy :)

mid engine since the engine sits behind the front axel.