im in the market for a new car and i cant decide between a 1995 honda del sol or a 1992 MR2 turbo. could some one help me out and y would u chosse one or the other

what do you plan on using it for? as far as performance goes, the mr2 is superior in pretty much every way.

Del dol = FWD, safer in the rain and snow, more reliable

Turbo MR2 = RWD, easier to spin (especially in the rain and snow), true mid-engine sports car, twice as fast with real potential

I cant think of a category in which to give the Del Sol points over the MR2, except for practicality (FWD.)

The MR2 is a superior car in every way (in good weather.) It has tons more potential, looks better, is more rare and exotic, and is actually a SPORTS CAR.

yea del sol is just not fast at all and unless ur looking for good gas mileage than get a MR2.

im planing on going performance then cosmetics

do u guys know of ne where in the washington state area that i could get one?

try autotrader. or your local classifieds. or ebay, then just search for cars in your area.

id try the seattle times classifieds....maybe the oregonian if youre near vancouver

like ac427 said autotrader.com is your best best most likely. You can find almost anything on there.

I got a 98 black 240sx for $6500 firm and a 91 mr2 turbo (Jspec 2nd gen Lsd) for $7500. E-mail me you're interested at quikmr2@mailcity.com we can work something out to get it shipped to you. The cars are in So.Cal.
-Randy

I used to own a del sol si before my MR2 Turbo, and the MR2 is much more satisfying to me in every way. It's faster, handles better, has more potential, and is much more rare than the del sol. That is not to say that the del sol is a bad car, just not a TRUE sports car like the MR2 is.

Click here (http://49313.mycarnetwork.com/)

Hope this helps.