Ford Mustang V6 vs. Toyota Supra n/a

This should be funny. :) The Rustang V6 or the non-turbo Supra... lol :):p

My auto max beats v6 stangs, so I would def. say supra. Although some kid at my school had a Saleen Certified V6 Stang that was doing around 12's low 13's.......but thats another story =)

Well considering the weight of the Supra I would have to go with the Stang on this one. That and the N/A supra does not have impressive performance at all.

Originally posted by Razorgtst
That and the N/A supra does not have impressive performance at all.

Niether does the V6 Rustang. lol :p Although I would think the Rust would win. Maybe maybe not. :)

ok ok....my money is on the Supra, here is why. A 1994 Toyota Supra non turbo is running a 0-60 in 6.9 and running a 1/4 time at 15.2. A 1995 Ford Mustang 3.8L is running a 9.9 0-60 and a 17.3 1/4 mile....so I recommend u do the math :D. If u want a driver's race for the Supra go get a 99 BMW 328i and if u want a drivers race for the Stang go get a 99 Ford Winstar SEL (don't laugh). :)

This has to be a joke :hehehe: Supra All Tha WAY :D beat the Hell out of that POS rustang

HAAAAAAAAAAH that stang wasnt no fkn NA it had a SC

and the 0-60 on a stock v6 stang isnt 9.9, its like 7 second range for the 200hp model and the 150hp is about 8-9seconds depnding on driver.

Either way it is an interesting comparison. I have driven a V6 Stang once and it went ok, but never been in an N/A Supra though I have driven a twin turbo charged Supra and that was Very impressive!