Rs200 Vs As200
MKIISupra
01-03-2004, 09:59 AM
Ok which car is better in your opinions AS200 with the 2.0L straight six or the RS200 with the 2.0L straight four (turbo)
matada
01-03-2004, 06:11 PM
I am unsure of other places, but here the rs is non turbo. It is the beams vvti and pushed about 210-220 stock. It also comes with the 6 speed manual. The as is a beams 2 liter minus the vvti and it is only available with an automatic. There has been talk of a stock turbo option, but one has yet to materialize. Lots of bolt on turbos available though.....
r34-gts
01-26-2004, 12:33 AM
man i dont no in aus we call em is200 is300etc so sorry man i dont noe wat ur on bout lol.
Toksin
01-30-2004, 05:11 AM
man i dont no in aus we call em is200 is300etc so sorry man i dont noe wat ur on bout lol.
And we have no idea what the hell you're trying to say.
And we have no idea what the hell you're trying to say.
HellBent
02-16-2004, 12:09 PM
I am currently driving an 1998 RS200 Z-edition. As for which is better, the 4 cyl is the more powerful engine, but I don't care for it much. It was fun for a while, because it revs to 8000 rpm and howls like a banshee. However, below 3000 rpm it feels like a lawnmower engine! Granted it really takes off at 5000 rpm when the vvti kicks in, but it is annoying to drive in slow traffic or start from a stop up-hill.
I prefer the v-8 from my Corvette! Can't beat the cubic inches! Maybe A turbo four wouldn't be too bad, but as far as I know the 4 cyl only comes in NA. Now a twin turbo inline 6 like the Skyline would be the ticket...
-AL
I prefer the v-8 from my Corvette! Can't beat the cubic inches! Maybe A turbo four wouldn't be too bad, but as far as I know the 4 cyl only comes in NA. Now a twin turbo inline 6 like the Skyline would be the ticket...
-AL
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2024