ultimately, including looks and performance, which is better, the Ferrari F-50 or Enzo Ferrari.

personally, the F-50 has the better looks and the Enzo has better performance, but i would ultimately choose the F-50. one reason is cuz the F-50 comes in a conventional manual and not the Enzo's F1 transmission (paddles). and the other reason is even though the Enzo is faster, the F-50 is plenty fast for me so the looks play a little bit bigger role.

i'd say the f-50 for the same reasons looks, it use to be my fav car but the enzo kills it in performance so much that i started leaning toward the enzo. but then again there's the f-50 gt
Specifications
Year 1998 Origin Modena, Italy
Make Ferrari Base Price Not Available
Model F50 GT Production Not Available
Engine & Transmission Body / Chassis
Position Mid Longitudinal Drive Wheels Mid Engine / RWD
Configuration Tipo F130A V12 Curb Weight 817 kg / 1801 lbs
Valvetrain Not Available Length 4578 mm / 180.2 in
Displacement 4700 cc / 286.8 cu in Width 1986 mm / 78.2 in
Power 536.9 kw / 720.0 bhp @ 10500 rpm Height Not Available
Torque 520.0 nm / 383.5 ft lbs @ 8000 rpm Wheelbase Not Available
0-60 3.3 seconds

F50... the Enzo just doesnt do it for me...

I'll be different and say I can't stand the looks of the F-50. Give me the Enzo any day of the week, however, offer me an F-40 and that would be a different story.

it's not fair to compare the enzo which is the new version with the old1 (the f50),although that the f50 has great style and i think like this great style wont come again as long as possible

I'll be different and say I can't stand the looks of the F-50.
It is a little too 'pretty' for my liking, especially compared to the no-nonsense F40. But the Enzo just has no emotion, its' shape leaves me completely cold

the enzo is great for performance, but is an ugly car. so the f-50 for me, same as most people here.

i'm not a fan of hte F50 either. give me the F40. i'll take that over even the ENZO. the F50 was a joke becusae it was suppose to be superior to the F40 but in reality it isn't that much better, it lacked torque, it wasn't that light, and it rode too harsh. maybe if they didnt' claim it to be road goin F1 it wouldn't have been critized soo bad. but if you look at it, even the F40 has a better power to weight, plus hte F40 looks much better in my opinion.

Labelling the F50 a joke is taking it a little far dontcha think? 60 in 3.7, 200+mph and over 400bhp/ton isnt exactly 'joke' material

sorry i did go alittle over board. but its just weird that ferrari spend soo much time and money to R & D the thing, and its barely faster then the F40.