here are my top five the beloved GT,srt-4,wrx,svt focus, acura rsx.
each have the advantage.

teh hellz u be gibber gabbering bout!

humm wrong forum.
moved.

teh hellz u be gibber gabbering bout!

I piddy da foo who don't include the BMW 3 series. Fo' some reason da chicks love doh'se cars.

Under US$25k???? Here it's R32 GTR, late model WRX STi, Lancer Evo I-VII, 3000GT VR4, Supra TT, HSV Clubsport, FD3S RX7, etc........ Poor deprived suckers :lol:

since when are those cars under 25K. and mendari normal 3 series under 25K dont even deserve to be on the same road as those cars. there luxury cars not sport cars. chicks love stangs believe me.

Best bang for the buck for under 25k? Pick up a straight/rust free second gen nova for less than 5k, and 20k on a sprayed aluminum block BBC. *Untouchable*

only cause i love the rare jap muscles
supra tt, 3000gt vr4, mazda RX-7, nissan 300ZX tt.
also but more common, trans am ram air, mustang cobra, camaro ss, also- srt-4, wrx, m3 bmw, porche boxter, might even be able to find a 1997 corvette c5 for $25,000. oh and the enzo, could probly find one for about $23,000 :iceslolan

dude were talkin bout new cars here.

oh :banghead:

WRX is the best of the bunch if you have to drive it on anything other than dry pavement. RSX probably has the best gas mileage and close with the Focus for the lowest insurance. SRT4 is probably the best sleeper car of the bunch. Mustang has the most power as long as you live in the desert where it doesn't rain.

Hands down the SRT-4 is the best bang for the buck in the $20,000 range. I would take it over the WRX any day. I took a test drive in both last weekend and there was no comparison.

Well the RSX-S is the best car I would say, the SRT-4 may be very fast but it is still a neon, and dodge reliable, i read an article about some SRT-4s having some engine and clutch problems this early...hahahahha

Well the RSX-S is the best car I would say, the SRT-4 may be very fast but it is still a neon, and dodge reliable, i read an article about some SRT-4s having some engine and clutch problems this early...hahahahha

:disappoin

Sorry but you read wrong. The SRT-4 is NOT a Neon. If you want to use that logic than the Evo is still a Lancer and the WRX and STi are still an Impreza. And you say "Dodge reliable" how freaking ignorant.

Well the RSX-S is the best car I would say, the SRT-4 may be very fast but it is still a neon, and dodge reliable, i read an article about some SRT-4s having some engine and clutch problems this early...hahahahha

those srt-4s are probably having problems cause of how hard its being drivin, i mean think about the type of people who would buy them, they probably bought it for speed, and they probably drive them pretty hard. also, its been out long enough that i would expect some of them to start having problems, not all of them are gonna be perfect, even cars, or companies known for good reliability will get problems this early.

those srt-4s are probably having problems cause of how hard its being drivin, i mean think about the type of people who would buy them, they probably bought it for speed, and they probably drive them pretty hard. also, its been out long enough that i would expect some of them to start having problems, not all of them are gonna be perfect, even cars, or companies known for good reliability will get problems this early.

Yeah, Chrysler needs to educate customers on how to take care of a turbo-charged car.

Oh btw if anyone doubts the srt-4 i would like to point out this article

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/projectcars/0310scc_projneon/

if anything this engine is overenginered


oh and btw its got the smoothest pull of any car that i've driven...very similar with the RX8's but way more powerful

funny how every time a thread include or makes mention of the neon srt-4.....we first have people critizing it then everyone defending it, then everyone telling about the past of dodge :lol:

funny how every time a thread include or makes mention of the neon srt-4.....we first have people critizing it then everyone defending it, then everyone telling about the past of dodge :lol:


that is true...it happens everytime....


the thing is that people keep bashing it whitout bothering to do any reaseach

this is exacly why SCC did that article i posted...they were sick and tired of hate mail regarding the srt4

quote from the article:
"But power isn't enough to satisfy some of you. Since our first test of the car, we've received approximately 6,000 letters saying exactly the same thing: "Sure the SRT-4 is fast, but it's still a Neon. It'll break down before the end of the quarter mile, blah blah blah..."

this is why we are defending it...people bash it based on prejudices and don't bother to make proper research

i really hate it when people don't give credit were credit is due

fine you don't like it don't buy it....but that doesn't make it a POS

Yeah, Chrysler needs to educate customers on how to take care of a turbo-charged car.

isnt it a mitsu turbo?

isnt it a mitsu turbo?

yeah

yeah do u mind answering the question. o i guess that was a dum question. i saw wat u said in my email notifaction "and that bad why". did i say that was a bad thing. and i knew that DSM made engines for damiler-chrysler cars. it was just a simple question.

yeah do u mind answering the question. o i guess that was a dum question. i saw wat u said in my email notifaction "and that bad why". did i say that was a bad thing. and i knew that DSM made engines for damiler-chrysler cars. it was just a simple question.


weird....yeah at the begining i misunderstood your post....and i realised it was just a question so i edited the post....


so completely disregard what i posted originally....i realised imediatelly that you did not mean that as a bad thing and i edited the post...i did not even realise that the email notification had the original reply since i don't use email notification myself

aight its cool.