|
|
Diablo 6.0 Vs. 550 Maranelloa007apl 12-14-2001, 10:45 AM www.motortrend.com/august00/lambvsferarri/specs.html a007apl 12-14-2001, 10:56 AM Originally posted by a007apl www.motortrend.com/august00/lambvsferarri/specs.html www.motortrend.com/august00/lambvsferarri/2.html a007apl 12-14-2001, 10:58 AM Originally posted by a007apl www.motortrend.com/august00/lambvsferarri/2.html www.motortrend.com/august00/lambvsferarri/1.html S Brake 12-15-2001, 02:06 PM I'm moving this to the Car Comparisons forum. a007apl 12-15-2001, 02:22 PM Originally posted by snowboarder927 I'm moving this to the Car Comparisons forum. Ok:cool: JBL85 12-17-2001, 07:01 PM that god damn ferrari guy sure knows how to make a car that you want to hump......but if your racing, go with the lammy hakka 12-17-2001, 07:22 PM I'd go with the lambo...its just awesome:D TatII 12-17-2001, 07:33 PM the lambo would kill it at a track. the 550 maranello is a road car, not a race car. in the bestmotoring video that i have where it shows the F355 and the 550 vs. the jdm super sports at the Suzuka track. the 550 did pretty bad. the R34 GT-R was more then a match for it. and the GT-R was suffering a great deal casue it was sooo hot that day and the turbo wasn't workin on its full potential and they 550 was behind the first half and couldn't shake the GT-R lose on the second half. LiuBei 12-19-2001, 04:19 PM Sorry, but you can't beat the Prancing Pony. The Maranello has been kicking everybody's ass since it came out. hakka 12-19-2001, 04:26 PM :confused: the 6.0 beats it by almost a full second to 60mph and tops out 10-15mph higher. It also has better handling, better brakes....everything. Personally, I would take either:) JBL85 12-19-2001, 04:35 PM Obviously you can, and the diablo also has all wheel drive.....not 50/50 split but still all wheels move =) JBL85 12-19-2001, 04:36 PM Originally posted by LiuBei Sorry, but you can't beat the Prancing Pony. The Maranello has been kicking everybody's ass since it came out. my last reply was in regards to that LiuBei 12-19-2001, 05:58 PM As if it mattered, but look at the price tag. And Ferraris have fewer problems JBL85 12-20-2001, 01:45 PM probably, but compared to a normal car they both have plenty but who cares, its a racing car, its suppose to have problems moe182 12-27-2001, 11:39 AM Originally posted by JBL85 but who cares, its a racing car, its suppose to have problems Huh? Anyways, i think why the lambo has problems is because like people said before its a race car, and is ment to be pushed. Its purpose was not to driven around town at 60kph in second gear, or even at 120kph in third....it was made to go up to 200+kph on a regular basis.... its just not healthy (and its cruel) for a car like that to just be driven around like its a normal car. But the 550 on the other hand is a built to be a gentlemens GT...a cruiser that can be driven as a daily driver. Its not a race car. Its much more practical then the Lambo. its a 2 + 2 layout, with a trunk. Think of it as a more expensive, and more driver orientated CL600..... a007apl 12-27-2001, 05:16 PM JBL85 12-27-2001, 10:00 PM yeah but its still very expensive to maintain, but I guess if you can afford it, you can afford to maintain it DavidG 01-20-2002, 12:39 PM i wonder why they didnt tested a lambo and the F50...:rolleyes: i would take the 550 maranello over the lambo any day :D vBulletin®, Copyright ©2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2009
|