Our Community is 662,000 Strong. Join Us.

Please Register or Login to access: DriverSide DriverSide Home | Service & Repair | Car Prices | Parts & Accessories | Reviews & Advice | My Garage

What happend to outdoing the Evo??


Pages : 1 2 [3]

LjasonL
02-05-2004, 01:03 PM
first of all that Evo made 525hp at the wheels!!!!!

I said that 2 or 3 pages ago! :lol:

Secondly using a different turbo does not have some magical juju that ruins emmisions, it is still the same air afterall.

Swapping turbos will ALWAYS affect emissions. I NEVER said it will always ruin your emissions, I said it will always affect your emissions. Why don't you slow down this time when you read instead of skimming over?

(with slight density changes if you do not use proper innercooling)

It's spelled intercooling :rolleyes:

It all depends on how you set it up, but since you think that your friends car is the standard for all scientific reserch and debate, you probably won't believe that anyway.

I used his car as an example. You said having a restrictive turbo kills emissions. So tell me why almost factory turbo car passes emissions through those little restrictive turbos while there are VERY FEW aftermarket turbo kits deemed CARB legal?

Quick question smart boy what was the corrected time for the STi??? Do you still think that it is faster in a stright line?? My memory may be failing me but I seem to recal that MT said a 13.2 in the 1/4.

You still haven't seen the link I posted earlier? :lol: :lol: :lol: I showed you an uncorrected time of a bone stock STi running 12.9. It weighed more than stock, and it was not a professional driver! Yes, it's faster in a straight line. Put down the magazines and try looking at some real world performance.

ban me for speaking the truth

Please show me where you have spoken the truth!

Prove to everybody here that I was right

Yeah, you're right, swapping blowoff valves increases boost and turbos don't need wastegates :rolleyes: Is that the truth you were talking about? :lol:

I don't mean to be a bully or anything but boost pressure usualy does not affect emmisions that much

Earlier you said "boost pressure doesn't affect emissions" now you say "boost pressure doesn't affect emissions that much". You're changing your argument.

Why do you think that they can legaly supercharge or turbocharge cars that hardly pass emmisions in stock trim

Please show me a CARB legal turbo kit for a vehicle that can "barely pass emissions in stock form". Please.

Read the latest SCC and check their emmisions test on that 700+hp supra running street gas.

Irrelevent. I never said you can't make a lot of power and still pass emissions. I did say making power will change your emissions.

LjasonL
02-05-2004, 01:16 PM
On second thought, I'm closing this thread. All you're going to do is skirt around all the valid points made by anyone, and spout off the same old crap again.

kfoote
02-05-2004, 01:26 PM
[QUOTE=Jared_80]... Like I said before emmisions are a % test otherwise there would be no SUVs on the road...QUOTE]

In many states (California included), trucks and SUV's have a different set of emmissions standards than passenger cars (yes, based on a percetage test, usually measured in parts per million). If they did have to meet the same standards, you would find a whole bunch of SUV's that are no longer legal.

LjasonL
02-05-2004, 01:29 PM
Whoops, forgot to close it :lol:

Or maybe Freakray closed it, I didn't notice and reopened it?

Whatever, closed now

Add your comment to this topic!