What is your opionon between a Rsx and Celica? What would you rather have and which ones performance is better?

RSX Type-S all the way. It performs better, looks way better and is just all around a way nicer car. But you can probably expect the same kind of responses in a RSX forum.....

One important point is the list of standard eq. Items as simple as Cruise Control are options, not standard, on the Celica. The Celica GT-S starts more expensive than the RSX-S and a similarly equipped Celica is far more expensive then the RSX. Celica seems like a nice car, very fast, good breaks, responsive steering. Nice pocket racer, but that is about it. IMHO. Probably really fun to drive hard, but, as I understand it, you have to drive it hard to get anything out of it because the power band is so high and so narrow. The RSX is a more refined and sophisticated car. The RSX should have a higher resale value. The RSX has better reliabilty, build quality, and lower true cost of ownership. The RSX also has a very active aftermarket.

That said, if you ask this question on a Celica board you will get 100 reasons why the Celica is better and I doubt they would be wrong. To each their own.

Check out the below links:

http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/comparison/articles/47901/article.html

http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=15&article_id=2373

Again, both are good cars. However, in my humble UNlearned opinion, you get a better car for both the long and short term at less money with the RSX-S.
--ryan

I my self like the RSX :iceslolan

been in both and id deffinitly take the gt-s if you just want a nice looking car with nicer features and in my oppinion looks better (love that there both 6 speeds) but for flat out acceleration and racing the rsx type-s would kill the gt-s hands down.

I like SEX by my self:iceslolan

Interesting...