Our Community is 940,000 Strong. Join Us.


how fast is an s2000?


megotgsr
08-23-2003, 07:51 PM
how fast is the s2000 in a 1/4mile? and what state do you live in?

THE4TH
08-24-2003, 02:16 AM
i've seen 1/4's listed by lots of diff people it seems to be decided that it's between high 13's to mid 14's somewhere in there.. at least that's what i've seen.. and i would have to agree.. not sure why it matters but i live in cali.. :smile:

megotgsr
08-25-2003, 03:38 AM
because i live in utah (4500) above sea level.
the s2000 would probably run mid to high 14's here

THE4TH
09-01-2003, 02:17 AM
yeah i'm like 5 ft above sea level.. lol
just a little diff..

A3GTI_Mikey
09-04-2003, 08:19 AM
Check this out

http://www.cyberstangs.com/autocalc/calc_quartermile.asp

NSXN8
09-11-2003, 03:29 AM
Check this out

http://www.cyberstangs.com/autocalc...quartermile.asp

That is a cool and useful site. However, it seems to be inaccurate. ie.. it says that the S2000 at an elevation of 100ft, does the 1/4 in 12.75. Most stock NSX's can't even do that. :disappoin. I punched in many different number combinations, and each result was about 1 second faster than what they should be. I'm not blaming you or anything; just thought i should make some comments about it.

BiMMa b0i M3
09-12-2003, 04:58 AM
the S2000's are not that fast if you think about, yeah they are fast for a 4 banger, but some dumb fuck in the S2000 msg board said that a stock S2000 can keep up with a stock 03 M5. No way in fucking hell its possible, even the old skool M5's (the E28 88 M5), the first year it was produced is faster, and has more hp/tq than the new S2000's.

90CRXZCSi
09-18-2003, 12:28 AM
They run mid to low 15's up here in Colorado (5280ft)

hondaracer
09-18-2003, 01:30 AM
ok I live in cali and the honda S2000, if the person knows how to drive, it should run a 14 flat. Thats the stock time and I've seen it at the tracks down here and thats what it should run bone stock.....

megotgsr
09-27-2003, 06:45 PM
the S2000's are not that fast if you think about, yeah they are fast for a 4 banger, but some dumb fuck in the S2000 msg board said that a stock S2000 can keep up with a stock 03 M5. No way in fucking hell its possible, even the old skool M5's (the E28 88 M5), the first year it was produced is faster, and has more hp/tq than the new S2000's.

dude an s2000 would get killed by even an m3!
anywho one just ran last friday at rocky mountain raceway(4700 above sea level) and w/ a good launch he got a 14.9

turbo_s2000_01
10-28-2003, 04:41 AM
i live in boston mass and mine ran a 13.91 at 102 completely stock now i run a spool turbo kit and i ran a 12.41 at 115 on street tires so i think is driving skills not the car and even car & driver got a 13.8 out of theirs

Kurtdg19
10-28-2003, 10:05 AM
The only possible way i can see a S2000 posting 15s is if the driver has absolutly no idea on how to lauch and use a stick. Their way to light to be running that high of times given their 240hp. If the driver is a decent amateur i see no reason they couldn't be posting mid 14s, but then again, the S2000 wasn't designed to be a 1/4mi. car. They perform heller on the track.

S2kStu
10-28-2003, 10:16 AM
This is true, the S2000 was never meant to be a drag racer. It can go through the twisties better than any of the cars listed above on this thread. But that's what the whole purpose of the car. 50/50 weight distribution + 2800 lbs + precise steering = Holy s*** that car can carve corners. One interesting fact though, it can walk a stock mustang GT. I've always just found that funny. 2.0 vs. 4.6, both N/A :iceslolan

20thGTI
12-16-2003, 07:18 PM
There is now way in hell an S2000 is running in the 13's i dont give a dam what elevations its running at. A toyota supra 325hp 315ft/lbs tq runs the 1/4m in 14.00. How the hell is an s2000 gonna run in the 13's, it has 140ft/lbs tq. Plus i drive a 20th anniversary GTI, i have a eurosport cold air intake and a chip by apr, and i blow on any stock S2000. sure to s2000 get me off the line but my 247lbs/ft tq and 199hp to the wheels will kill it when i hit second. And there is no way my car will run in the 13's so how in the hell can a s2000. whoever says they do is full of shit and if you got a s2000 and want to roll.....bring it ill smoke u as well.

Mr.M
12-16-2003, 08:10 PM
dude an s2000 would get killed by even an m3!

yah so easy, M and M3 got more torque than a s2000.

Redteam22003
01-11-2004, 01:34 PM
There is now way in hell an S2000 is running in the 13's i dont give a dam what elevations its running at. A toyota supra 325hp 315ft/lbs tq runs the 1/4m in 14.00. How the hell is an s2000 gonna run in the 13's, it has 140ft/lbs tq. Plus i drive a 20th anniversary GTI, i have a eurosport cold air intake and a chip by apr, and i blow on any stock S2000. sure to s2000 get me off the line but my 247lbs/ft tq and 199hp to the wheels will kill it when i hit second. And there is no way my car will run in the 13's so how in the hell can a s2000. whoever says they do is full of shit and if you got a s2000 and want to roll.....bring it ill smoke u as well.you forgot to add the weight jack ass...i dont own a s2000 but i do have a suzuki gsx 1300R with only 90hp ill rip you a new ass...(10s in 1/4m)

KrNxRaCer00
01-12-2004, 05:50 AM
don't bring up a month old thread to flame back at someone plz.

i understand ur new (welcome to the boards,) so its cool. jus try to watch when the last post was an PLEASE don't start up arguements over dead issues.

thx...

Add your comment to this topic!